My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/15/2021
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
06/15/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2021 2:01:46 PM
Creation date
8/26/2021 1:57:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/15/2021
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ASHLEY MOODY <br />ATTORNEY GENERAL <br />STA'T'E OF FLORIDA <br />April 13, 2021 <br />Chairman Joseph Flescllcr <br />Indian River County <br />ISO 127th St <br />Vero Beach, FL 32960 <br />Ji�- LESCI-IER@IRCGOV.COM <br />RE: Opioid Litigation <br />Dear Chairman Joseph Fleseher: <br />OFFICE OF THE A°CTORNEY GENERAL. <br />111,-0 1 The Capitol <br />Tallahassee, IT 32399-1050 <br />Phone (8M)4 14-3300 <br />fax (850) 487-0168 <br />lutli:Lhrnu'• n{tJlaridnle�aLcan <br />My name is John Guard and i am the Chief Deputy Attorney General for the State of <br />Florida (the "State"). Since she took office, Attorney General Moody has been heavily involved <br />in leading both the State's ongoing opioid litigation and several different negotiations with <br />defendants in that litigation. Those negotiations have included litigation counsel representing <br />cities and counties. y <br />As part of those negotiations to enable Florida to achieve the maximum amount <br />recoverable for both the State and its subdivisions, the State has been negotiating fora lengthy <br />time with outside counsel for nearly all litigating political subdivisions within the State. After <br />multiple sessions and significant compromise by both sides, the attached memorandum of <br />understanding (` vfOU") has been reached. We have olfered and the lawyers for the litigating <br />subdivisions are recommending to their clients that the attached MOU be accepted. This <br />proposal is the result.of numerous meetings and includes feedback and comments from many <br />local subdivisions. Based on the status of this litigation, the likely structure of any resolution, <br />the potential litigation risks in the absence of such an agreement, the State believe that this <br />proposal reflects a reasonable compromise betxvicen the State and its political subdivisions. <br />The purpose of this letter is to summarize the primary terms of the MOU and attempt to <br />anticipate questions that you, your commission, and your internal and/or other legal counsel may <br />have regarding this litigation and allocation proposal. <br />Page 1 of 7 <br />53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.