My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/24/2021
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
06/24/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 4:27:23 PM
Creation date
9/14/2021 4:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Miscellaneous
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/24/2021
Meeting Body
City of Vero Beach
Subject
1989 Territorial Agreement
Conflict Resolution Meeting
Document Relationships
07/22/2021
(Agenda)
Path:
\Meetings\2020's\2021
07/22/2021
(Cover Page)
Path:
\Meetings\2020's\2021
09/08/2021
(Agenda)
Path:
\Meetings\2020's\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County constituents and all County taxpayers. They have to understand that what he is hearing is that <br />the City seems to be planning to continue to charge County rates to the Town, but the County still has to <br />answer to their unincorporated residents and what they are already offering is Tess control than what the <br />Town receives. There is already a problem where the Town residents might be getting better treatment <br />than unincorporated County residents. It is a very challenging situation for them. What they are <br />presenting here today is in the spirit of cooperation. He expressed that the County was not actively <br />looking for new customers. They have plenty of growth in the unincorporated areas that does present its <br />own challenges for them to continue serving the increased demands. But, what they are experiencing is <br />residents who meet with them andsay that they want out of the City service area, which is the same thing <br />that they are hearing from the Town. The County is happy if the City continues to serve these residents, <br />but one (1) of the concerns that they are expressing is the "taxation without representation." This is why <br />they are just looking for some rate protection. He said that he does not know where the rates are going. <br />He said the County is having to adjust their rates. They are doing an annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) <br />adjustment to increase their rates because the cost to provide service continues to increase with the new <br />regulatory environment that they are in. They are just looking for some kind of protection for those <br />residents. He reiterated that the County is perfectly happy for the City to continue providing service to <br />those residents. However, it does put them in a terrible spot to say that they cannot provide the same <br />service to the residents in the unincorporated areas that the Town is receiving. That is why they are <br />seeking a compromise on this. <br />Mr. Bolton commented that he was speaking with the previous Town Administer about having one (1) <br />rate for everything and then came the lawsuit so discussion had to stop. Their ultimate goal is to have <br />one (1) rate and no surcharges. He would like to see everyone treated the same. <br />Mr. Falls said that the reason they need to have the decision on the rates is because of the construction <br />of the new facility. He has not heard anyone who is opposed to the City doing that project and getting <br />that facility off of the Lagoon. They are trying to make that happen. It is a new environmental sound and <br />sensible project to getting any contamination off of the river. However, that does come with a cost. There <br />will need to be some rate adjustments because of that. The rates would not stay the same even if the <br />Plant is left on the river and they didn't build the new facility. There are also costs to leaving it there that <br />would be passed on to all the ratepayers. They would like to be charging the same rates to all their <br />customers. He hoped that staff could go back and caucus these items presented to them this morning. <br />Mr. Turner stated that the process is if there is not a resolution entered into or agreed to today then the <br />next phase is the meeting between their respective Council/Boards in a joint meeting. He said that has to <br />occur according to Florida. Statutes within 50 -days after the datethat the letter was sent from the City to <br />the County. He said that date can be extended by a written agreement of both parties. It is 50 -days unless <br />they agree otherwise. He said during this period of time they can have on-going discussions regarding <br />what has been proposed today. He said if they could set a date today or arrange for that joint meeting it <br />might help keep them moving forward. <br />Mr. Reingold read directly out of the. Florida Statutes that says if there is a tentative resolution that they <br />can agree upon by the representatives of the primary conflicting governmental entities at the conflict <br />assessment meeting that the primary conflicting entities may proceed taking whatever steps they deem <br />appropriate to fully resolve the conflict including but not limited to the schedule of additional meetings <br />for informal negotiations or proposing a resolution of the governing bodies of the primary conflicting <br />entities. He said in the event that no tentative resolution can be agreed upon then they have the 50 -days. <br />He was hoping that today they could walk away saying that they think that they can work this out. He <br />Page 4 June 24, 2021 Conflict Resolution Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.