Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final July 6, 2021 <br />At the request of Chairman Flescher, County Attorney Dylan Reingold <br />explained that temporary easements were not an option because grant funding <br />required that the project demonstrate a continuous public benefit. Additionally <br />he noted that residents in other beach sectors had agreed to an easement in <br />perpetuity, and treating sectors unequally may create a policy challenge for the <br />Board. Attorney Reingold also made mention that the easements helped <br />establish customary use which was important to preserve beachgoer's access. <br />Joe Paladin, President, Black Swan Consulting, addressed the Board with <br />additional suggestions to work around the problem of obtaining beach access. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Earman, seconded by Chairman Flescher, <br />to approve staff's recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: <br />Aye: 5 - Chairman Flescher, Vice Chairman O'Bryan, Commissioner Adams, <br />Commissioner Earman, and Commissioner Moss <br />H. Utilities Services <br />13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS <br />13.A. 21-0645 Resolution of Necessity for five Parcels of Right -Of -Way Located along 66th <br />Avenue between 69th and 85th Streets, Vero Beach, FL 32967: Parcel 127 (Lipfert <br />and tenant Tongay), Parcel 128 (Williams), Parcel 130 (Sexton), Parcel 132 (Van <br />Antwerp) and Parcel 151 (Barker/Strickland) <br />Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Resolution of Necessity and authorize <br />staff to proceed with the necessary right-of-way acquisition through the County's <br />power of eminent domain. <br />Attachments: Staff Report <br />Resolution <br />Composite Exhibit A to Resolution <br />Deputy County Attorney Bill DeBraal appeared before the Board to request <br />approval of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition of property needed for <br />right-of-way in the expansion of 66th Avenue. He explained that this was the <br />second step in the eminent domain process, and did not require a public hearing. <br />Attorney DeBraal described the five parcels, two of which had businesses, and <br />negotiated make -goods. He advised that business -owners and tenants had the right <br />to possible damages as a result of the take. <br />In response to a request for clarification from Commissioner Moss, Attorney <br />DeBraal informed that the areas of take varied widely among the properties because <br />engineers determined that 66th Avenue needed to curve to the east to avoid a <br />Florida Power and Light substation. He added that the County had been in <br />negotiations with the land owners leading up to this point. <br />Indian River County Florida Page 8 <br />