My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/8/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
8/8/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:12 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:43:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/08/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Tippin recalled he had argued for exceptions.in <br />the past and recounted a situation of selling his own brother a <br />five -acre piece away from a paved road. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, <br />SECONDED BY Commissioner Bird, to approve <br />staff's recommendation to deny the request. <br />Under discussion, Chairman Macht asked Director Boling if it <br />was possible for the square footage to be expanded under the <br />accessory dwelling rule because the occupant of the proposed <br />dwelling is disabled. <br />Director Boling explained that the variance criteria always <br />deals with hardships related to the property itself, not to the <br />occupants. Also, the variance ordinance specifically prohibits <br />variances to specific land use criteria that are put in place for <br />special uses, such as accessory dwelling units. So, unless the <br />LDRs are changed, there's no way to expand the 750 square feet. <br />Commissioner Bird was sympathetic, but thought the situation <br />was very clear. He pointed out that innumerable similar cases have <br />been denied at staff level. He felt the staff should be supported <br />in their interpretation of the very clear ordinances the Board has <br />adopted. <br />Mr. Ferguson added the 750 square foot restriction requires <br />the dwelling to be on the same piece of property and there would be <br />no bank financing available for the project. In the future, he <br />would have no problem paying his portion for the road paving, but <br />now it wasn't feasible for a half acre. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that if a large undeveloped property <br />to the south ever develops, staff would require them to make a <br />connection to 62nd Avenue. If so, they would require it to be <br />paved through to 33rd Street, which may open other options. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION <br />motion carried 4-1, Commissioner <br />opposed. <br />23 <br />and the <br />Adams <br />August 8, 1995 ED;c M,f,'�t : 871 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.