My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/07/2021 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2022 10:52:09 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 2:38:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/07/2021
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
489
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORDER NO. PSC-2021-0442-FOF-EI <br />DOCKET NO. 202 10001 -EI <br />PAGE 8 <br />ISSUE 2G: What is the appropriate subscription credit associated with FPL's <br />SolarTogether .Program approved by Order No. PSC -2020 -0084 -S -EI, to be <br />included for recovery in 2022? <br />Stipulation: $113,512,426. <br />ISSUE 211: Should the Commission approve FPL's 2022 Risk Management Plan?4 <br />Stipulation: Yes. FPL's Risk Management Plan (RMP), which was filed as Exhibit GJY-2(S), <br />contains no natural gas financial hedging transactions pursuant to the Settlement <br />Agreement approved in Docket No. 20210015 -EI. The RMP complies with the <br />Hedging Guidelines established by the Commission and should be approved. <br />ISSUE 2I: What is the appropriate revised base rate adjustment factor for the <br />Okeechobee Clean Energy Center (OCEC) limited scope adjustment (LSA) <br />to reflect actual construction costs that are less than the projected costs used <br />to develop the initial factor? <br />Stipulation: 3.014%. <br />ISSUE 2J: Has FPL appropriately accounted for any redispatch related to its 2022 <br />operation of the NFRC in its 2022 projections? If not, what adjustment, if <br />any, should be made? <br />Stipulation: Yes. FPL's fuel projections for 2022 are based on the economic dispatch of its <br />system under non -nal operating conditions and therefore, do not include any <br />potential redispatch related to the operation of the NFRC, or any other <br />contingency. FPL does not adjust its projection model to account for real-time <br />contingencies or system conditions, that may or may not occur, that would <br />necessitate the redispatch of generation to alleviate transmission issues. As is the <br />case for all redispatch occurrences, any redispatch related to the operation of the <br />NFRC will be reflected as actuals in the subsequent actual/estimated and true -up <br />filings. The OPC reserves the right to contest any costs related to redispatch of <br />transmission that may be included in subsequent actual/estimated and true -up <br />filings. <br />Florida Public Utilities Company <br />ISSUE 3A: Should an adjustment be made to remove any legal and/or consultant fees <br />included for recovery in FPUC's 2022 fuel factors? <br />Stipulation: OPC and the utility agree that recovery by FPUC of legal and/or consultant fees <br />through the Fuel Clause is a broader issue involving a potential shift from past <br />a FPL and Gulf fled a single 2022 Risk Management Plan applicable to both utilities. Document No. 11768-2021. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.