Laserfiche WebLink
OVERALL REVIEW OF THE PLAN <br />There are several areas within the 1982 Comprehensive Plan that <br />contain deficiencies, as defined by today's standards. For <br />example, there were no goals specified for each element, and many <br />objectives and policies were mixed or absent. For those objective <br />included within the 1982 plan, many were general or contained no <br />directional pattern. There was also no method of evaluation, nor <br />were there methods for the implementation of the elements, with <br />the exception of the Sewer and Water Elements and the Recreation <br />and Open Space Element. In addition, there were inconsistencies <br />among the elements with regard to the overall format of the plan. <br />Unlike the 1990 comprehensive plan, the 1982 Plan was based upon <br />the requirements of the 1975 Act. The 1975 Act was structured to <br />provide a more general direction for planning. As such, the Act <br />was much less specific than the 1985 Act in mandating plan <br />content. Indian River County, however, has been active in <br />planning, has provided the necessary urban services, has <br />maintained an adequate level of service and has worked to satisfy <br />its residents' needs. <br />Overall, Indian River County has maintained a pro -planning <br />attitude. As a result, the county has followed the policies of <br />the 1982 Plan. There have been only a limited number of <br />amendments to the 1982 Plan, mostly minor changes that have served <br />to strengthen the plan. With regard to land use, the amendments <br />have served to reduce densities or to expand parts of the <br />Commercial -Industrial Districts. <br />The 1985 Act is much more specific than was the 1975 Act. By <br />compelling governing bodies to demonstrate the economic <br />feasibility of their comprehensive plans, the 1985 Act ensures <br />that goals, objectives and policies of the 1990 Plan will be <br />realistically and economically achievable. The 1990 Comprehensive <br />Plan for Indian River County is not only more detailed than the <br />1982 plan; it will also be easier to implement and evaluate. The <br />Implementation Matrix for each element identifies the actions <br />which must be taken, who is responsible for the action, the <br />timeframe for the action and any funding required. The Evaluation <br />Matrix shows the measure for each objective and the timeframe in <br />achieving the objective. These matrices not only provide <br />effective tools for the county to implement the plan, but they <br />will make it easier for the county to conduct future evaluations. <br />Indian River County has evaluated and appraised its 1982 plan and <br />the Comprehensive Plan for 1990 will replace the 1982 plan upon <br />state approval. <br />27 <br />