My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-082
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
1980'S
>
1989
>
1989-082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 11:12:34 AM
Creation date
3/14/2022 11:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
1989-082
Approved Date
08/23/1989
Resolution Type
Approve Evaluation & Appraisal Report of 1982 Comp Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAND USE ELEMENT <br />There are two objectives identified in the 1982 Indian River <br />County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element: <br />1. Urban development shall be encouraged to fill in <br />available land closest to service areas of the county so <br />as to avoid "spot development". Lower density and <br />intensity shall take place in areas that are <br />environmentally sensitive and in areas outside the urban <br />service perimeter. <br />2. Incompatible land uses should be separated from one <br />another. Where they do abut, appropriate physical or <br />natural buffers will be established. <br />Assessment <br />All urban development, with the exception of that occurring in the <br />I-95/SR 60 Node, has occurred east of I-95 and in proximity to <br />urban services. The 1985 comprehensive rezoning of all the land <br />in the county has en;cnred compatibility of recent development with <br />the Land Use Plan. At least one hundred amendments to the Land <br />Use Plan have been submitted since the 1982 Plan. Of those <br />adopted, most amendments served to expand development areas within <br />the county. Adopted amendments to the Land Use Plan have <br />consistently maintained the integrity of the plan. Present land <br />use regulations, the revision of the Zoning Code in 1984, and <br />market influences have combined to keep most development in the <br />vicinity of Vero Beach and Sebastian. The most intensive <br />development has occurred where water and sewer are available, <br />areas such as SR 60, US 1 adjacent to city limits and portions of <br />the north island. A lack of services and facilities has resulted <br />in development at lower densities in outlying areas. There are, <br />however, some unintended disincentives for infill development <br />caused by higher impact fees in the more developed areas. <br />Areas designated as environmentally sensitive in the 1982 Plan <br />have been protected from significant development. The Transfer <br />of Development Rights (TDR) provisions in the Indian River County <br />Code of Laws and Ordinances for Planned Residential Developments <br />(PRD's) has helped to maintain many of the wetland areas along the <br />Indian River. The Grove Isle PRD is one example of a TDR within <br />Indian River County. Conservation easements, such as the one used <br />for Orchid Isle Estates, have also been successful in preserving <br />environmental areas as called for in the 1982 Land Use Element. <br />As revised in 1984, the county's zoning regulations include <br />specific buffer requirements by land use type. New development is <br />required to have buffering when adjacent to dissimilar uses. These <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.