9/12/1995 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Barkett stated that his purpose was not to prevent the paving of Willow Street; he wanted to show that this was not the best or correct way and was not acceptable under State law. He questioned how the original proposal differed from this proposal. Director Davis explained the alternative was presented tonight, but after ground-truthing the area they realized the perimeter canal to the west was a better barrier for the assessment area and it was their opinion that the extension of the west perimeter made more common sense. Mr. Barkett pursued this line of questioning of Director Davis and Chairman Macht concerning the timeline of the paving of Willow Street planning process. He pointed out that 600 acres were added to the original plan and he believed they were added and the assessments were predicated upon the cost of the project. Mr. Barkett stressed that Fellsmere would be receiving a $185,000 benefit, yet there was only $46,000 assessed to property. He concluded that the county property owners were paying for it, which was not fair or just. Director Davis did not agree with Mr. Barkett's conclusion. Mr. Barkett argued special benefits had not been taken into consideration because no benefit analysis had been done, as required by the County's ordinance and Chapter 170. Mr. Barkett opposed the fact that assessments had been made for non -assessable lands: such as wetlands, rights-of-way, FPL easements, remote properties to the road, and that agricultural lands of one acre were assessed on the same basis as 1/4 acre residential lots. Mr. Barkett recalled the lowered area of assessment for Berry Groves and compared it to Mr. Kahn's area of assessment. He argued that Mr. Kahn's vacant property does not benefit by use of the road and it is not valid to reason that someday it might be used. Another reason why the assessment was invalid, illogical and unfair, Mr. Barkett pointed out, is that $150,000 was included in the assessment for right-of-way acquisition. All but 400 feet of the necessary right-of-way would be bought from Mr. Kahn and his money from the special assessment would be used to pay for it. He commented there is a fundamental due process problem with that. Mr. Barkett called on his professional engineer to analyze the special assessment and identify some of the things he perceived in the project. Carol Saunders, vice president of Williams Hatfield & Stoner, an engineering, planning, and surveying firm, added that generally you do not see county property paying for a city street in an 44 September 12, 1995