02/01/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final February 1, 2022 Ms. Forst referred to Senate Bill 620 and House Bill 569, noting these were local government bills that created a cause of action for established businesses to recover losses from a County or municipality whose regulatory action caused significant impact on their business. She reviewed the amendments to Senate Bill 620 which included prevailing party language, attorney fees and costs, clarified that a business must have had operated within the jurisdiction in question for at least three years prior to filing damages, and clarified that ordinances that were expressly authorized to comply with State and Federal law were exempt from business damages. She felt this language would protect some of the County's Ordinances, specifically the Biosolids Moratorium. She remarked that the House fled a proposed committee substitute that matched the Senate language and the County planned to work with House Representative Erin Grall as the bill moved through the House. She expressed some concerns on the language contained in the House version of the bill and stated the County was proposing language to include in the bill that would require businesses to have paid all their fees, assessments, taxes, require that all licenses were in compliance before a business could file suit for damages, require that attorney fee provisions were equal on both sides, and to allow an ordinance being upheld in court to go into effect upon rendition of an order. Ms. Forst outlined Senate Bill 280 and House Bill 403, pointing out that these bills addressed attorney fees and business impact statements if a local government enacts an ordinance on a matter preempted to the State. The bill would require counties to develop a business impact statement prior to the adoption of a proposed ordinance or suspension of an ordinance's enforcement and its amendments. She stated that the County planned to work closely with Representative Grall to update the House version to match the exemptions in Senate Bill 620. Ms. Forst concluded with an update to Senate Bill 512 and House Bill 325 on Vacation Rentals, mentioning that the County was working closely with Senator Danny Burgess to include language that would grandfather -in the County's existing Vacation Rental Ordinance and regulations. Chairman O'Bryan commended Ms. Forst for her work in Tallahassee. Chairman O'Bryan referred to a guest commentary article written by House Representative Randy Fine on House Bill 349 (HB 349) that would allow seagrass mitigation banks. He asked for the Board's consensus to direct staff to contact the County's Lobbyist Group to oppose HB 349 and to add it to the list of approved legislative priorities. He also provided an update on the bill that was fled to eliminate the Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCD) and indicated the bill's sponsor amended the language in bill to change the SWCD Board member requirements. Indian River County Florida Page 15