Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Stringer disclosed that he had discussed with each <br />Councilmember a compromise position, and they are willing to talk about things on <br />which they could pull back. He said they are looking for a little County pull-back, <br />because there are no limits on how many "New Towns" can go out there and these New <br />Town developments are pretty intense. <br />Attorney Stringer displayed a map of the of the WEC area (the extension <br />of the traditional neighborhoods, and the transitional area), and pointed out the area <br />where Sebastian city limits borders CR 510. He stated that they would take the area of <br />77th Street to 69th Street from that line east and give that up. He also pointed out the areas <br />they could pull back on, which is about 2,200 acres, and the remainder they would wrap <br />into the WEC and adjust the numbers. They would put in a minimum and probably raise <br />the maximum a bit, but they would keep it with that — a one-to-one development between <br />job generating and residential/commercial. He said Sebastian would pull in its reserve <br />area at the cross -hatch (reflected on the map) and then eliminate the traditional Sebastian <br />neighborhood aspect and just wrap what's left beyond the Urban Service Area into the <br />WEC, which is somewhat of a modified New Town with a little more emphasis on job <br />creation. <br />Attorney Stringer responded to questions from Commissioner Davis <br />regarding the geographical boundary asking if that was 82nd Avenue at the canal. <br />Commissioner Davis was concerned about the area from 77th Street to 69th <br />Street, and the change that would have on smaller land owners in the area. Attorney <br />Stringer had mentioned a 1 unit per two acres or 2 units per one acre, and Commissioner <br />Davis wanted to see that withdrawn if possible, in that area. He questioned whether <br />Attorney Stringer was asking the County for a total withdrawal of its New Town policy <br />in exchange for pulling that off and leaving that in the A-1 zoning. <br />14 <br />July 23, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />