Laserfiche WebLink
the sustainability of this County. He talked about infrastructure being in place before <br />the residences and gave examples of other communities where the entire infrastructure <br />was in place prior to anyone moving into that community. He believed it could be done <br />with the best management practices. <br />A OTHER ISSUES <br />Councilmember Simchick talked about the transfer of density rights, and <br />noted that page (20) of the backup mentioned "... conservation, agricultural preservation <br />transfer density rights ... " and wanted to make sure that does not include the St. Johns <br />conservation area. Her other issue was with the Urban Services Advisory Committee <br />(USAC). She objected to the USAC Committee being chaired by the County only, and <br />felt the Chair should rotate. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan, in response to Councilmember Simchick's <br />comments regarding TDRs, explained that normally when land is purchased for <br />conservation, like our environmental bonds, it requires us to extinguish those <br />development rights. They cannot be transferred or sold, and he believed St. Johns has <br />similar restrictions on the funds they use to purchase conservation lands. He thought this <br />would apply more, for example, with Fellsmere's revised map, if the Corrigans wanted to <br />get additional benefit from their land, they could then sell those development rights to a <br />project in Fellsmere and reap some economic benefit from their land without having to <br />develop it. He reminded that "transfer" just means they are moving those densities from <br />1/unit per 20 -acres to maybe a more appropriate place, and it does not increase the overall <br />density; it just moves it and brings it tighter together. Commissioner O'Bryan was <br />agreeable to review and change. <br />25 <br />July 23, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />