My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07_23_2008
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
07_23_2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 11:02:53 AM
Creation date
4/20/2022 10:58:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/23/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
City of Fellsmere
City of Sebastian
City of Vero Beach
Town of Indian River Shores
Town of Orchid
Subject
Interlocal Service Boundart Agreement
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the sustainability of this County. He talked about infrastructure being in place before <br />the residences and gave examples of other communities where the entire infrastructure <br />was in place prior to anyone moving into that community. He believed it could be done <br />with the best management practices. <br />A OTHER ISSUES <br />Councilmember Simchick talked about the transfer of density rights, and <br />noted that page (20) of the backup mentioned "... conservation, agricultural preservation <br />transfer density rights ... " and wanted to make sure that does not include the St. Johns <br />conservation area. Her other issue was with the Urban Services Advisory Committee <br />(USAC). She objected to the USAC Committee being chaired by the County only, and <br />felt the Chair should rotate. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan, in response to Councilmember Simchick's <br />comments regarding TDRs, explained that normally when land is purchased for <br />conservation, like our environmental bonds, it requires us to extinguish those <br />development rights. They cannot be transferred or sold, and he believed St. Johns has <br />similar restrictions on the funds they use to purchase conservation lands. He thought this <br />would apply more, for example, with Fellsmere's revised map, if the Corrigans wanted to <br />get additional benefit from their land, they could then sell those development rights to a <br />project in Fellsmere and reap some economic benefit from their land without having to <br />develop it. He reminded that "transfer" just means they are moving those densities from <br />1/unit per 20 -acres to maybe a more appropriate place, and it does not increase the overall <br />density; it just moves it and brings it tighter together. Commissioner O'Bryan was <br />agreeable to review and change. <br />25 <br />July 23, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.