Laserfiche WebLink
F, <br />Boox 96 pnf1 7 <br />2. Traffic. Impacts from mining operation truck traffic include: <br />traffic volume, the size and type of vehicles used, the slow- <br />moving nature of loaded trucks during turning movements and <br />when accelerating after stops, physical impact on road <br />surfaces due to heavy loads, dust and debris generated from <br />unpaved road surfaces, and spillage. Traffic volume impacts <br />are addressed via the site plan traffic analysis review and <br />project concurrency reviews. In addition, during the site <br />plan process traffic engineering reviews the need for any off- <br />site improvements (e.g. turn lanes, deceleration lanes, apron <br />paving at intersections involving an unpaved road and a paved <br />road) in light of the slow-moving characteristics of loaded <br />trucks and their size. <br />The current LDRs also address physical impacts on roadways by <br />requiring: measures to protect pavement edges, paved driveway <br />aprons, and posting of bonds to guarantee repair to unpaved <br />roads used as haul routes. In regard to dust generated by <br />spillage, current LDRs require the beds of loaded trucks to be <br />covered. In addition, paved driveway apron requirements help <br />eliminate jarring and resulting spillage that could occur when <br />a truck enters a public road from a mining site. Furthermore, <br />to reduce conflicts between trucks and' local residential <br />traffic, the current LDRs restrict truck hauling routes to <br />collector or arterial roads or local roads that serve non- <br />residential uses. <br />Even with these restrictions and regulations, traffic was a <br />concern expressed by residents living in the general vicinity <br />of the proposed Rebel Ranch mine. Even though the Rebel Ranch <br />project proposed to access 82nd Avenue (an arterial that <br />functions as a truck route) via a segment of 5th Street S.W. <br />(a collector road that does not serve residences on the <br />subject segment), concerns were expressed about truck traffic. <br />In staff's opinion, the existing regulations which restrict <br />haul routes to arterial and collector roadways or "non- <br />residential" local roads is the only viable regulation that <br />reduces potential traffic conflicts and still allows use of <br />the county's major roadways for such truck traffic. <br />3. Groundwater Protection. Current regulations prohibit <br />dewatering operations within 1,000' of a platted subdivision <br />that is not serviced by public water. (Note: the Rebel Ranch <br />proposal involved hydraulic dredging rather than dewatering.) <br />Also, applicants for projects using dewatering are required to <br />demonstrate that no saltwater intrusion or water quality or <br />quantity problems will result from the proposed mining <br />operation. In addition, no mining operation (whether or not <br />dewatering is used) is to have significant adverse impacts on <br />groundwater quality or water levels. <br />Since county staff does not have expertise in groundwater <br />hydrology, staff has relied on the St. Johns Water Management <br />District (which has hydrologists) to ensure, through its <br />permitting and monitoring process, that groundwater effects <br />are properly addressed. County staff's understanding from St. <br />John's staff is that hydraulic dredging operations have no <br />significant adverse impacts on the groundwater quality or <br />quantity of surrounding wells. Staff from St. Johns River <br />Water Management District, including Rich Burklew of the <br />groundwater division, have committed to attending the workshop <br />to address questions from the Board and the public. <br />In its survey of other counties, staff found that some <br />jurisdictions require mining applicants to furnish a <br />____groundwater impact analysis from a hydrologist. Such reports <br />SEPTEMBER 219 1995 8 <br />r <br />