My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/08/2022
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2022
>
03/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:54:04 AM
Creation date
4/28/2022 11:43:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/08/2022
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Does the project site have characteristics, based on site conditions and location that make it conducive <br />for a public storm -water treatment facility compatible with site resource protection? (5 points) <br />(t) Historic Resources [15 POTENTIAL POINTS] <br />1. Does the project site contain a site listed in the Florida Master Site File maintained by the Division of <br />Historical Resources? (5 points) <br />2. Will acquiring the project site protect a resource that is listed or is eligible for listing on the National <br />Register of Historic Places by the National Park Service? (5 points) <br />3. Does the project site contain significant historic and/or cultural resources recognized by a local historic <br />board where said resources will be readily accessible to the public if the site is acquired? (5 points) <br />(g) Agricultural Resources [15 POTENTIAL POINTS] <br />1. Does the project site contain an existing vizble agricultural operation located outside of the urban <br />service area, with an owner willing to entertain an offer to sell development rights and sustain a viable <br />agricultural operation on the site "in perpetuity"? (5 points) <br />2. Does the project site contain an existing viable agricultural operation located outside of the urban <br />service area but east of Interstate 95, with an owner willing to entertain an offer to sell development <br />rights and sustain a viable agricultural operation on the site "in perpetuity"? (5 points) <br />3. Does the project site contain active or inactive agricultural lands with altered ecosystems with <br />reasonable potential for natural area restoration, adjacent to a wildlife corridor, greenway or blueway? <br />(5 points) <br />HAZARD MITIGATION SECTION [10 POTENTIAL POINTS] <br />1. Flood Hazard Area. Will the project acquisition direct residential or commercial development away <br />from a coastal high hazard area or a 100 -year flood plain? (5 points) <br />2. Local Mitigation Strategy Priority. Is the project site located within an area identified in the County's <br />adopted Local Mitigation Strategy as a mitigation priority? (5 points) <br />MANAGEMENT AND COST -SHARE SECTION [10 POTENTIAL POINTS] <br />1. Are characteristics of the project site favorable for land management (i.e., site contiguous to other <br />publicly managed lands; not small and isolated; adjacent land uses compatible with land management <br />needs; landowner or other agency to manage land, etc.)? (5 points) <br />2. Is the project site contiguous to or a part of an existing federal or state land acquisition project, or does <br />the site have characteristics such that cost -share funding availability or less -than -fee -simple county <br />acquisition is likely? (5 points) <br />SPECIAL STATUS SECTION [5 POTENTIAL POINTS] <br />1. Special Status Area. Is the project site located within or contiguous to the boundary of a state or <br />federally designated area not credited elsewhere in these criteria that protects or restores natural, <br />historic or agricultural resources (e.g., National Scenic Byway, Front Porch Community, etc.)? (5 <br />points) <br />73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.