Laserfiche WebLink
am 96 pAu 492 <br />property and they had a handshake agreement to put in a berm and <br />type "a" buffering to separate the development from his property. <br />He received a call the next day from Ken Kennedy whose lawyer had <br />told him it was ill advised. <br />Dr. Lewis thought it was a bad precedent and there was no <br />demonstrated need and that it adversely affected his property <br />value. He asked that the Board deny any change in zoning for <br />property #4. He suggested the Board consider making it light <br />commercial and go back to the original agreement he had with Mr. <br />Kennedy and Mr. Ryall with berm and type "a" buffering to diminish <br />the impact on his property. <br />Bruce Barkett, attorney representing Wabasso Industrial Grove <br />and Hobart Landing II, Earring Point Groves, and Kennedy Groves, <br />and N.B. and Rachel Ryall, advised that his clients are seeking <br />approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. After hearing _ <br />traffic concerns expressed at the last hearing, they hired Kimley <br />Horn to address those concerns. He cited points why the proposed <br />changes are in the best interest of the community and the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Using his own aerial, Attorney Barkett handed <br />out a proximity study (see next page) in order to address the <br />concerns of Dr. Lewis. <br />108 <br />October 24, 1995 <br />