Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 96 PAu 444 <br />south, about 42 acres in total. He believed it would benefit the <br />county, but wanted assurances that the industrial park would, in <br />fact, be built. He asked if it was possible at this time to put <br />either an infrastructure requirement on the property owners or a <br />time requirement so that it actually is an effective redesignation. <br />He concurrently asked if it would be proper to request the PD <br />zoning, so the owners would not come back later and ask for CG <br />zoning to bring more retail into the area. <br />County Attorney Vitunac explained that the Code did not allow <br />for conditional Comprehensive Plan zoning, but it does allow the <br />Board to look again at the issue annually to see if the zoning is <br />proper. One factor, inactivity, would indicate it is not proper. <br />Director Keating assured Mr. Culbertson that policy 1.24 in <br />the Comprehensive Plan would require reversion if the development <br />does not commence in two years. <br />Commissioner Eggert viewed it as a good faith effort at this <br />time. She explained that the Council of 100 had looked for a <br />developer of an industrial park and this is a first step in the <br />process of designating 100 acres toward that objective. She <br />thought the developers understood about the rezoning. She is <br />looking forward to it happening, we will know quickly if it goes <br />awry. <br />Mr. Culbertson asked about concurrent PD zoning, and Director <br />Keating responded that a specific plan has to be developed before <br />PD rezoning would occur. <br />R. J. McMillan, of 305 Live Oak Road, a partner in a nearby <br />14 -acre parcel on I-95, which he identified on the site map, <br />stressed that he favors an industrial park there. He felt Scott <br />Lambeth would do a good job, but he was told they needed 120 acres <br />to start. He was concerned what would happen if they could not get <br />the additional acreage. He questioned why the County had, he felt, <br />gone overboard on land swapping to help a private individual along. <br />In order to give his support, he wanted restrictions placed now so <br />that no commercial would be allowed there later. <br />Chairman Macht felt that all the necessary elements (location, <br />utilities, and affordability) had converged on this particular <br />piece of property to make an industrial park feasible. He had been <br />disappointed with the previous lack of enthusiasm on the part of <br />the business community. His objective was to see light industry <br />attracted to provide jobs for people who badly need them. He <br />Octob=4, 1995 - <br />