|
NN 96 FACE 454
<br />ORDINANCE 95-25
<br />GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S
<br />URBANIZED AREAS*
<br />STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS
<br />FREEWAYS
<br />UNINTERRUPTED FLAW
<br />Cs•eup A (ter than 0.60 slgmlised intersections per mite (Waratiagu par a
<br />Group I (within urbanized sues• over 5".000
<br />apaeitb aeudyde a ta09tly4 ualeternuptad pesaloaa and
<br />and !ceding to or within
<br />5 miles Of primary city control business distrtat)
<br />_ the portioaa wabjeca so capacity eamaswiale mbmdd be
<br />evaluated aepenlolya
<br />LeO6w Level of service
<br />A B C D E
<br />Lams Level of Service
<br />2 Undiv. 4.600 12.000 16300 20.000 24,700
<br />A B C
<br />4 D
<br />E
<br />4 Div. 11,000 28,000 36.700 42800 60200
<br />6 25`M 40.000 57,100 66,900
<br />60,000
<br />74,100
<br />6 Div. 16,400 42.400 66,300 64800 7b.300
<br />75
<br />66.600 103.400
<br />6 80,100
<br />111,200
<br />8 Div. 20,?00 63100 69 200 60,600 a 00
<br />'W 114,200 197.900
<br />10 64.800 100x00
<br />149,200
<br />142,700 172,300
<br />12 76,800 117,000 166,800 2111,600
<br />I86,900
<br />218,700
<br />DMILRUPPED FLOW
<br />14 86x00 132,900 189AN 228x100
<br />246JO0
<br />Croup B (0.60 to 2.49 signalized interactions per mile)
<br />Group 2 (within urbanized any and not in Group 1)
<br />Lemr Leval or service
<br />laws
<br />Divided A•• g C D FM
<br />Laval of service
<br />2 Undiv 11.6110 14.700 163011
<br />4A C D
<br />24� 37B�
<br />E -
<br />4 Div. 26,900 31.900 34,200 34.200
<br />6Uiv 40,.700
<br />� 64.200
<br />_ C 6
<br />89,100
<br />48.400 61,200 61,200
<br />8 Div. 49.900 59AM 62,800 62,800
<br />I. 8 48,400 74,600 106,400 126,,600-.138.200
<br />A 10 60.400 96,300 139.000 180
<br />172,700
<br />s 12 70,600 109,000 155,400 187,700
<br />XII
<br />S 14 77.9011 120.900 171.600 207300
<br />222.700
<br />Croup C (2.60 to 4.50 signalized intersection per mile)
<br />1 NON -STATE ROADWAYS
<br />LAnest Level of service
<br />18A,lOR CITY/ODUNTT ROADWAYS
<br />Divided A•• B•• C D
<br />Lema
<br />2 Undiv. 9.600 13.400 1. -EE
<br />5,000
<br />4 Div.
<br />Divided Aa Leval of service
<br />C
<br />211,500 29,400
<br />6 Div. 32�
<br />31,300 45.000 48,600
<br />D
<br />2 Undiv. 10,800 13,400
<br />E
<br />14,700
<br />8 Div. 381•610 6 AN 60.400
<br />4 Div.
<br />6 Div. 23,800 44'M
<br />S'
<br />. 36.M 44,700
<br />47,900 m
<br />Croup D (more, than 4.50 signalized intermlions per mile cad not within
<br />Primary city central business distrdistrict of urbanized
<br />OTRBR BIGNALTlBD ROADWAYS
<br />arca over 600.000)
<br />C (s(gm k -d intersection analysis)
<br />L
<br />A Lamw Level of service
<br />Lens,s
<br />Lov421 of Service
<br />Divided A" g.. C D
<br />E
<br />Divided A— g•• C.. D E
<br />9 2Undiv. 5.200 10300
<br />11,700
<br />2 Undiv.
<br />' 11.600 14.700
<br />4•
<br />U 11,600 28,800
<br />25,W
<br />4 Div.
<br />• 24.600 38,11110
<br />6 Div. 38.700 49,00
<br />8 Div. 48.000 60.100
<br />ADJUSTMENTS
<br />DrAMR130UMMMED
<br />Group E ;more than 4.50 sl
<br />signalized intersections per mile and within
<br />("'ter car Pe -Pending two-way volume indicated percent)
<br />Primary eitYxmtral business district of urbanized
<br />arae over 500,000)
<br />C [aures Median Lett Tum Bays Adjustment Factors
<br />L
<br />2 Divided Yn . 5%
<br />Leresi m"' of Service
<br />L
<br />A 2 No 1616
<br />Divided A" g.. C— D E
<br />Multi Undivided Ya 616
<br />2 Undiv.
<br />13,000 14,700
<br />s Multi Undivided No 20%
<br />4 Div. -
<br />6 Div. 28.8 32.000
<br />111
<br />44,100 49.000
<br />8 Div' 54,700 Goa 00
<br />ONIi-WAY
<br />(altar csmsspoading two-way volume indicated percent)
<br />OneWay, Corresponding Adjustment
<br />Lean 71se•Way Lams Factor
<br />2 4 • 40%
<br />8
<br />g -40%,
<br />4
<br />8 -40%
<br />6
<br />g -25%
<br />The !able don not constitute a standard and should be
<br />used wily for p•nersl planning aPpScatims, The compute models from witieh thi
<br />far more specific planning appiicatiorm The table and dortving computer s table is derived should les
<br />ld b
<br />models
<br />Values shown an annual average daily taalfte (AADT) maximum cel— 2
<br />Highway Capacity Manusl
<br />should net be used f
<br />(based ar corvi�r or irUarspction dedgn, where opo reacted tshi
<br />on K100 tatters. not peak to daily
<br />use
<br />use d
<br />ratios) fur lav"'s of ssevfee, and ars basad an
<br />vhm.a rad ar bo
<br />and Florida tra(lic, roadway said sigrrliyWm data. The tan,.es input value ssaumpa mor sod lav"'
<br />•• Cannot be achieved.
<br />the 1985
<br />Volumes are comparable because inlersoclion
<br />of service r the {nark.
<br />capacities are reached.
<br />Source: Florida Department of Transportation, 1991.
<br />IFD
<br />04/1'1/92
<br />70
<br />October 24, 1995
<br />
|