My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/01/2022 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2022
>
02/01/2022 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2022 11:58:35 AM
Creation date
6/17/2022 1:05:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/01/2022
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />Exhibit "D" <br />IR Impoundment #18 Management Plan <br />May 1992 <br />Because our proposed management plan will establish seasonal laeoon- <br />marsh connection and allow for more precise water level controls, we <br />expect the plan to cause no further harm to these animals as compared <br />to management conducted here since 1958. <br />Based on the study of RIM effects in IRC impoundments, we expect the <br />habitat improvement brought about by RIM to generally benefit wading <br />birds. The seasonal drying allowed by RIM should further improve bird <br />feeding potential by concentrating fish in ponds and the perimeter ditch. <br />Research has demonstrated that RIM is basically compatible with the <br />life cycle of several commericaliy and recreationally important fish, thus <br />snook should benefit (O'Bryan et al). It is unclear what effect RL M - <br />management has on Rivulus. Current theory holds that a RIM managed <br />impoundment is preferable to a closed impoundment (Scott Taylor, pers. <br />com.) but there is a lack of documentation of what real effects RIM <br />may have. It is anticipated that there will be no further deleterious <br />effects by increasing the number of culverts. <br />Although impounding is believed to be harmful to the atlantic salt <br />marsh snake by reducing their normal habitat during the summer, RLM <br />implementation should not further harm this animal. Habitat should not <br />deteriorate for the eastern indigo snake and the gopher tortoise. <br />Of all the animals listed, the potential adverse effects for the alligator <br />are greatest. It is expected that making Impoundment #18 seasonally <br />intertidal will increase salinities when tidal water is allowed to penetrate <br />the marsh (rye., fall/winter & Wig). However, given that the <br />Freshwater Prand should not be influenced by culverting and that - <br />sahnrties in Impoundment #19 (adjacent to the north) are virtually fresh, <br />a large amount ,of freshwater habitat will remain in this immediate area <br />for the alligators use. <br />C. MOSQUITO POPULATION CONTROL SECTION <br />1• GENERAL. 11RMCD controls saltmarsh mosquitoes by Integrated Pest <br />Management .(IPW methods. This variety of methods include the <br />seasonal flooc$ng of impoundments, brvidding, and ground ULV (ultra <br />low volume) adulticiding 'le different elements of this IPM program <br />are implernentred on'a need basis. Need is determiried by incorporating <br />reports from iIRMCD entomologists, biologists and field personnel on <br />the presence. cof larval or adult mosquitoes. Also, reports and service <br />requests from local residents are taken into consideration. Currently, <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.