My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
12/5/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:13 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:17:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Recently, a subdivision proposal and a single family home building <br />permit application brought the need for an LDR change to staff's <br />attention. The needed change relates to the setback implications <br />of locating a new subdivision road right-of-way along the border of <br />an adjacent property. To address this need, staff is proposing an <br />LDR amendment that will be processed along with several other LDR <br />amendments. <br />Staff is now requesting that the Board of County Commissioners <br />invoke the pending ordinance doctrine so that staff can begin <br />applying the substance of the proposed change prior to formal <br />adoption of the proposed LDR amendment. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />•Proposed Change <br />Under current regulations, subdivision developers are allowed to <br />locate new road rights-of-way along the border of a property being <br />subdivided (platted) and adjacent property. Where a right-of-way <br />is to be located next to an adjacent property, current regulations <br />require the subdivision developer to provide landscape improvements <br />between the new subdivision road and the adjacent property. The <br />current regulations allow the buffer to be located completely <br />within the boundaries of the new road right-of-way. <br />Staff's experience over the last several years is that the <br />requirement has worked well by resulting in effective landscape <br />buffers. Although these landscape requirements mitigate the visual <br />impacts of an adjacent road right-of-way, current regulations <br />affect adjacent property owners with increased setbacks. Current <br />regulations apply front yard setbacks in all circumstances where a <br />property is adjacent to a road right-of-way. These front yard <br />setbacks apply even where the right-of-way is established via a new <br />subdivision, where the right-of-way contains a landscape buffer, <br />and where the right-of-way provides no access to the adjacent <br />property. Thus, in certain circumstances, a new subdivision road <br />right-of-way established along the perimeter of an adjacent <br />property could change a side yard setback into a front yard setback <br />for the adjacent property owner. Such a change usually results in <br />a setback increase of 101. This increase is beyond the control of <br />the adjacent property owner and restricts the buildable area of the <br />parcel. To correct the negative impact of the existing setback <br />regulations under such circumstances, staff has drafted the <br />following proposed change to the land development regulations <br />(LDRs): <br />1. For parcels adjacent to existing subdivision road rights-of- <br />way, where the parcel is separated from the subdivision <br />roadway by required landscape improvements and where the <br />parcel cannot be accessed by the subdivision roadway, the <br />portion of the parcel adjacent to the right-of-way shall be <br />treated as a side yard where a side yard would exist absent <br />the right-of-way. <br />2. For new subdivisions where a road right-of-way is proposed <br />along the border of the property to be subdivided, the <br />required landscaping improvements shall be located in a <br />separate landscape tract (minimum width: 101) established <br />between the right-of-way and the adjacent property. (Note: <br />the result is that the setbacks on the adjacent property will <br />remain the same.) <br />With such changes, the landscaping requirements would continue to <br />be required, while the negative setback impacts would be eliminated <br />in existing and future situations. <br />DECEMBER 5, 1995 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.