My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/17/2022 VAB
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2022
>
08/17/2022 VAB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2022 1:51:11 PM
Creation date
8/25/2022 1:37:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
08/17/2022
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusions of Law for Petition 2020 - <br />Florida Law requires the Property Appraiser to establish a presumption of correctness. For the Property Appraiser to <br />establish a presumption of correctness for the assessment, the admitted evidence must prove by a preponderance of the <br />evidence that the Property Appraisers just valuation methodology complies with Section 193.011, Florida Statutes and <br />professionally accepted appraisal practices. in the instant matter, the Property Appraiser established a presumption of <br />correctness for the assessment because the admitted evidence proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the <br />Property Appraiser's just valuation methodology complies with Section 193.011, Florida Statutes and professionally <br />accepted appraisal practices. Since the Property Appraiser established a presumption of correctness, the Petitioner <br />must overcome the established presumption of correctness by proving that the admitted evidence fails to prove by a <br />preponderance of the evidence that: (a) the Property Appraiser's just valuation does not represent just value; or (b) the <br />Property Appraiser's just valuation is arbitrarily based on appraisal practices that are different from the appraisal <br />practices generally applied by the Property Appraiser to comparable property within the same county. In the instant <br />matter, the Petitioner failed to overcome the Property Appraiser's established presumption of correctness because the <br />admitted evidence fails to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: (a) the Property Appraiser's just valuation <br />does not represent just value; or (b) the Property Appraiser's just valuation is arbitrarily based on appraisal practices <br />that are different from the appraisal practices generally applied by the Property Appraiser to comparable property <br />within the same county. Therefore the appraisal should be upheld. <br />2020- Page 3 of 3 <br />-55- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.