Laserfiche WebLink
- M M <br />Contract for the County to upgrade the existing 800 MHz system to <br />the new technology of the future, should it decide to do so, at a <br />discount for the equipment. Ericsson also noted that additional <br />vendors have been authorized to manufacture and distribute <br />communications equipment compatible with the °EDACS° technology. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: <br />The various alternatives regarding the 800 MHz Communications <br />System have been reviewed and information is provided below for <br />your review and consideration. <br />ALTERNATIVES REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF AN 800 MHz SYSTEM <br />Alternative No. 1: Do not recommend construction of an 800 MHz <br />Communications System.. <br />The current public safety VHF and UHF communication systems now in <br />use is 1950's vintage technology, except for the existing 800 MHz <br />5 channel trunking, non-public safety system, used by Indian River <br />County. The FCC has approved its spectrum refarming policy which <br />places public safety entities and other users of channels below 512 <br />MHz in a position of being forced to migrate to narrowband <br />communications equipment over the next several years. Given the <br />fact that a majority of existing communications VHF and UHF <br />equipment is in poor condition, skips and interference are <br />experienced, there are many dead spots where communications cannot <br />be transmitted or received, and concerne about liability, the issue <br />is whether to purchase old technology or advance to a more modern <br />technology wherein interoperability between agencies and efficient <br />use of the spectrum is achieved. <br />Ref arming is going to have a great impact on VHF and UHF <br />communications in the future. We now have 10 conventional <br />channels. If we do not obtain the 800 MHz National Public Safety <br />Planning Advisory Committee (NPSPAC) public safety channels <br />allocated to us in the Region 9 Communications Plan, they will be <br />lost, possibly forever, and the County will not be able to go to a <br />larger channel 800 MHz system in the future. Even if the refarming <br />policy is disregarded, the majority of the existing public safety <br />communications systems currently in place are aged and not <br />sufficient to do the job. They would have to be replaced in the <br />near future. The issue is whether old or new technology will be <br />approved for purchase and do we provide a system allowing inter- <br />agency communications. <br />Alternative No. 2: Recommend construction of an 800 MHz <br />Communications System that includes public safety entities only. <br />This alternative could not be done within budget (10/2), the <br />channels would be insufficient, and it would solve only part of the <br />communications problem for public safety. There would be no <br />interoperability, refarming of the spectrum would continue to <br />affect the coverage of other agencies, and the NPSPAC channels <br />would be lost. The vendor informs staff that the expense to add <br />backbone equipment later to support all users would probably double <br />in cost. <br />In time, other agencies would have to.fund costs associated with a <br />redesign of their communications systems, including infrastructure <br />(towers, transmitters, repeaters) as old radios are replaced with <br />radios that operate with narrowband technology. <br />Alternative No. 3: Recommend construction of an 800 MHz <br />Communications System which includes only the Indian River County <br />administration. <br />This alternative could be done, maybe within budget (10/2), with <br />the deletion of phone interconnect, digital interface, and west <br />tower. It would solve the communications problem for the county <br />administration. However, the law enforcement problem would <br />continue to exist, since they would continue, to operate in the <br />spectrum below 512 MHz on worn out equipment and refarming would <br />impact coverage as new radios utilizing old technology is purchased <br />as replacements. A new system will have to be purchased in the <br />future and the NPSPAC public safety 800 MHz channels will probably <br />not be available in the future. <br />Alternative No. 4: Recommend construction of an 800 MHz <br />Communications System which includes only the Indian River County <br />administration and the Sheriff's Office. <br />This alternative would resolve <br />and the Sheriff's Office, but <br />existing budget "and the 10/2 <br />support this number of users. <br />December 19, 1995 <br />the problems for the administration <br />it could not be done within the <br />channels would be insufficient to <br />The Sheriff's Office would not have <br />55 <br />Boob 96 w,&849_15 <br />