Laserfiche WebLink
® r � <br />Alternative No. 12: Review the user equipment list and reduce the <br />expenditure for new radios and accessories where appropriate <br />without adversely affecting operational capabilities of county <br />agencies. <br />This has been done as noted on the attached Indian River County <br />user equipment worksheet. A% large number of the control stations <br />have been reduced to a basic MDX mobile radio package using a desk <br />microphone, antenna, coax, and antenna. Also, quite a number of <br />portable radios have been reduced from level one to a level two <br />radio to save as much money as possible. <br />A reduction has been achieved in the County user equipment. For <br />the most part, only public safety agencies now have level one <br />radios unless a unique need was demonstrated. The reduction in the <br />cost of user equipment pertains only to that which the County is <br />purchasing. Other agencies' user equipment was not;adjusted. <br />Alternative No. 13: Delete the fiber optic cable expense of <br />$677,545 from a cost associated with the 800 MHz Communications <br />System. <br />As noted earlier, the communications system will be a relatively <br />small user of the fiber optic cable. <br />The main advantage of using fiber optic cable is that it is not <br />affected by lightning or electrical interference, it is durable, it <br />has the ability to transmit data,_video, or voice at great speeds, <br />limited maintenance cost, and the ability to withstand significant <br />weather events. The fiber optic cable is simply a means or method <br />by which the various communications towers will be connected <br />together. The cable could possibly beused by County organizations <br />or other entities on a lease or cost basis with the revenue <br />obtained from this source going to other uses. <br />Alternative No 14: Delete the digital interface feature of the 800 <br />MHz system and fund this cost in the future, delaying the <br />expenditure of approximately $300,000, which would have to be <br />funded in a later year. <br />Deletion of the digital interface equipment of the system would <br />save approximately $300,000 at this time. However, the vendor <br />informs staff that to add this to the backbone a couple of years <br />later, the estimated cost would be $700,000. <br />This alternative would also delete the encryption features within <br />the system. Law enforcement agencies will utilize these features <br />for drug enforcement and investigations. Other agencies needing <br />this everyday capability include EMS for the purpose of maintaining <br />patient confidentiality when communicating with the hospitals, fire <br />service for the purpose of arson investigations, bomb threats, and <br />hazardous materials communications. The installation of these <br />features would need to be funded in the future. Deletion of this <br />feature would impair the system design and eliminate a needed <br />function of the system. It is not recommended by this writer, but <br />is an option to -be considered. <br />In addition to the various alternatives referenced above, the <br />County will probably not have another opportunity for a private <br />entity to construct two free-standing towers at a cost of $705,000 <br />.with a total contribution of $60,000 from the County. There is <br />some minor cost the County will incur such as bringing power into <br />the site and routine recurring costs for electricity, generator <br />fuel, etc. As stated earlier in this document, a proposed Lease <br />Agreement has been worked out with TALCOM, INC., a subsidiary of <br />AT&T Wireless Services, for the two towers to be built on County <br />leased or owned land if the Board approves the two contracts. <br />The proposed system is the minimum which has been determined as <br />necessary to provide viable, stable, and functional communications <br />to all the users in the County. It is by no means the "Cadillac• <br />version or "Optimum System" available on the communications market <br />today. There are many other options and capabilities that could be <br />purchased such as Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL), Mobile Data <br />Terminals (MDT's), simulcasting three sites instead of two, <br />additional channels, and a status and message system. The County <br />can migrate into the above options in the future, if desired, since <br />for the most part, the options and features are software driven. <br />57 <br />December 19, 1995 <br />