My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/2/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
1/2/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/02/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As -per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency <br />review because the requested zoning would not increase the use <br />intensity of the site. <br />By changing the zoning of the subject property from CH to IL, <br />manufacturing and industrial uses not currently allowed would be <br />permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of <br />the property would be the same with either zoning district, <br />changing the property's zoning from CH to IL would not create <br />additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. <br />When new development is proposed <br />detailed concurrency analysis <br />development approval process. <br />for the subject property, a more <br />will be conducted during the <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that a light industrial zoning district would <br />be appropriate for the subject property and would result in <br />development compatible with surrounding property. <br />The principal impacts of development on. the subject property would <br />be on the 13 lots in the Vero Shores _ subdivision that abut US 1 <br />east of the subject property. Four of those lots are currently <br />developed. There are, however, several circumstances which would <br />serve to mitigate the potential impacts associated with this <br />request. Those circumstances are listed below. <br />• US 1 provides at least 130 feet of physical separation between <br />the subject property and Vero Shores. <br />• Required front and rear yard setbacks (20 feet for buildings <br />in the Vero Shores subdivision and 25 feet for the subject <br />property) provide additional separation. <br />• Development of the site will require the installation and <br />maintenance of buffers and landscaping. <br />• All industrial development is required to undergo site plan <br />review. Through this process,' potential impacts will be <br />minimized with site design. <br />• The large overlap of uses permitted under both the proposed IL <br />zoning district and the existing CH zoning district reduces <br />the chances that granting this request will result in an <br />increase in impacts on the surrounding area. <br />For these reasons, the proposed rezoning can be expected to have an <br />insignificant impact on the adjacent property. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of <br />the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the <br />overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use <br />Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, <br />conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their <br />densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in <br />nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. <br />19 <br />JANUARY 2 1996 BOOK 9.7 PACE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.