09/20/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Community. The majority of these residents feel this is a good community in which to live, regardless of age. When asked specific questions about their neighborhoods and specific services and amenities, however, location differences emerged. Housing. While most reported little or no issue in finding affordable housing to buy, Is this not skewed by the high percentage of home ownership by the sample. the results were less positive regarding rental housing. The availability of good housing for low-income families seems to be particularly problematic. There were no major deficiencies in home maintenance or hurricane preparation assistance. Our experience through the Collaborative is there are no assistance programs available for home maintenance. The sample has higher incomes and home ownership than County demographics. Respondents from Zones 1, 4, 5 and 7 were more likely to report deficiencies. Outdoor Spaces and Buildings. Once again, most were positive about the availability of safe parks with walking areas and benches, safe walking areas, accessible public buildings, public restrooms, and well-maintained sidewalks. It is important to note, however, that this was less true in certain zones. Results related to accessibility by people with disabilities were inconclusive. When asked to discuss deficiencies that are important to them, many mentioned a lack of affordable housing in general and several specified the lack of well-maintained sustainable housing. Transportation and Streets. A large majority of these IR residents drive themselves. Use of public or special transportation services is very low. Their assessments of bike and pedestrian paths, safe pedestrian crossings, safe intersections and sidewalks varied significantly by location with major gaps in several zones. Health and Wellness. These respondents seem to be healthy, able-bodied, active and to have health insurance. Most have not had problems accessing medical and health services. It should be noted that many are unsure about their availability, indicating that they probably have not needed them. Many who had encountered difficulties felt strongly enough to provide comments, particularly related to affordability. Their primary sources for mental and physical health information are their doctors or health care professionals or people they know, followed by internet or online sources. Social Participation, Inclusion and Educational Opportunities. Most of these residents report being both physically and socially active, and feel they have adequate access to cultural and spiritual activities. They were a little less positive about opportunities for affordable social events, opportunities to meet new people, special interest groups and continuing education. Employment. To summarize, most of these respondents are not in the job market so job availability is not an issue. However, many feel there are too few good employment opportunities for those looking for work in Indian River County. Zone Differences. Based on the results of this survey it appears that most people find Indian River County a good place to live in terms of housing and local amenities. This is particularly true in the more -developed City of Vero and Vero Beach and the more affluent island communities. The most important findings are how residents in several other zones consistently provided more negative assessments. This was particularly evident in Zones 1 (Fellsmere, Roseland, Summer Place) and 5 Livable Indian River Survey Data Report 920