Laserfiche WebLink
1. Is likely to have an adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job creation or employment, <br />or private sector investment in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the <br />implementation of the rule; <br />2. Is likely to have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including the ability of persons <br />doing business in the state to compete with persons doing business in other states or domestic markets, <br />productivity, or innovation in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the <br />implementation of the rule; or <br />3. Is likely to increase regulatory costs, including any transactional costs, in excess of $1 million in the <br />aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule. <br />(b) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply <br />with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the <br />rule. <br />(c) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government <br />entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state or local <br />revenues. <br />(d) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, <br />including local government entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in <br />this section, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard <br />business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment <br />required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, <br />additional operating costs incurred, the cost of monitoring and reporting, and any other costs <br />necessary to comply with the rule. <br />(e) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by s. 288.703, and an analysis of the <br />impact on small counties and small cities as defined in s. 120.52. The impact analysis for small <br />businesses must include the basis for the agency's decision not to implement alternatives that would <br />reduce adverse impacts on small businesses. (Indian River County, according to Census 2020, has a <br />population of 159,788; therefore, it is not defined as a small County for the purposes of this <br />requirement.) <br />(f) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. <br />(g� In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any regulatory <br />alternatives submitted under paragraph (1)(a) and a statement adopting the alternative or a statement <br />of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule. <br />Note: the references to "rule" in the statutory requirements for the Statement of Estimated Regulatory <br />Costs also apply to an "ordinance" under section 190.005(2)(a), F.S. <br />113 <br />