My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/13/1996 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
2/13/1996 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:48 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:18:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
construction projects, however, are quite complex, require <br />extensive construction, and may take 12 months or more to complete. <br />General contractors handling such projects have indicated to staff <br />that construction trailers are needed for such jobs and that a <br />standard 8' X 32' construction office trailer should be <br />accommodated under the LDRs. <br />Staff's research indicates that the 8' X 32' trailers (256 square <br />feet in area) are the smallest construction office trailers that <br />are widely available. Furthermore, it is staff's opinion that, on <br />the rare occasions when a temporary construction trailer is used on <br />a single family home job site, use of an 8' X 32' trailer is <br />reasonable to accommodate the approved construction activity. <br />Therefore, staff has drafted the section 13.amendment. <br />Section 14, Allowing fish farm uses to be approved at a staff <br />level. <br />During the last round of LDR amendments, the Board of County <br />Commissioners approved changes that allow staff -level approval of <br />certain types of administrative permit uses. Such staff level <br />approval is also limited to projects that do not involve major site <br />plan -review. Administrative permit uses -that -are now approved by <br />staff rather than the Planning and Zoning Commission include: <br />specialty farms, non-commercial stables, mobile homes in <br />agricultural districts, and guest cottages. <br />The county desires to streamline the approval process for fish farm <br />uses since such uses are considered non -controversial- in <br />agricultural districts and since such uses are considered <br />potentially important for local economic development. All special <br />criteria for such uses would still apply. Therefore, staff has <br />proposed the section 14 amendment. <br />Section 15. Correcting scrivener's error: veterinary clinics <br />allowed in CL district. <br />Section 971.14(2) contains a.scrivener's error by omitting the CL. <br />district from the list of districts in which veterinary clinics may <br />be located as an administrative permit use. Chapter 911 (Zoning) <br />states that such a use is allowed in the CL district. To correct <br />this error, staff has proposed the section 15 amendment. <br />Section 16. TIF schedule update and elaboration. <br />These modifications will not result in any TIF rate increases but <br />will make it easier for applicants and staff to quickly determine <br />TIF amounts for the new uses specified, and will codify existing <br />TIF policy. <br />LDR Chapter 953 contains a traffic impact fee (TIF) schedule table <br />that provides the TIF rate for specific types of uses by TIF <br />district. Most development project uses fall within one of the use <br />categories specified within the existing fee schedule. Over the <br />years, however, planning staff and traffic engineering staff have <br />made TIF rate determinations for certain uses not specifically <br />covered within the existing schedule. These special determinations <br />are now being applied to certain project uses as a matter of <br />policy. Staff now proposes to modify the schedule to add specific <br />use categories and corresponding TIF rates, codifying what is.now <br />being applied as a matter of policy. <br />The proposed use category rates were determined by staff using the <br />same formula and type of input data used to determine the rates <br />found in the existing schedule (see attachment •7). The TIF rate <br />formula takes into account the demand that a particular use type <br />places on the county's Thoroughfare Plan roadway network. Demand <br />components include trip rate, trip length, percent new trips, lane <br />capacity, and road cost per lane mile. ITE and available local <br />study -data are used. The formula also gives credit for revenues, <br />including license fees and gas taxes, and includes a 15% discount <br />to ensure that the resulting TIF is.a conservative and easily <br />Justifiable number. It should be noted that the TIF ordinance <br />allows developers the option of performing an individual TIF <br />assessment in lieu of the fee schedule rates. Staff's experience <br />over the last 9 years is that developers almost never opt to do an <br />individual TIF assessment since the fee table rates are <br />conservatively derived. <br />The proposed fee schedule modifications add some use categories for <br />classification purposes and add other categories to more <br />specifically address certain uses. In summary, the additions <br />include: <br />1. Accessory single family unit (same fee as multi -family unit) <br />2. Condominium/efficiency apartment (same fee as•multi-family <br />unit) <br />3. Clinic/veterinary clinic (same fee as medical clinic) <br />4. Mini -warehouse (new fee) <br />5. Vehicle storage (new fee) <br />6. Automotive repair (new fee) <br />7 <br />FEBRUARY 13, 1996 <br />BOOK 97 Pn 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.