Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final November 15, 2022 <br />Attachments: Staff Report <br />Demolition Lien <br />Assistant County Attorney Susan Prado recalled that on December 11, 2013, a lien <br />was recorded for the costs of a demolition at 1705 45th Avenue, and as of <br />November 15, 2022, the costs of demolition and interest totaled $9,796.76. She <br />stated the new owner of the property had contacted the Attorney's office and <br />inquired on a lien reduction. She concluded that consistent with recent practice, <br />the County Attorney's office recommended that the Board waive 90% of the <br />accrued interest, if the lien and the remaining 10% of the interest was paid within <br />60 days in the amount of $6,334.86. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Adams, seconded by Chairman O'Bryan, to <br />approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote: <br />Aye: 5- Chairman O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Earman, Commissioner Adams, Commissioner <br />Flescher, and Commissioner Moss <br />14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS <br />A. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman <br />B. Commissioner Joseph H. Earman, Vice Chairman <br />14.6.1. 22-0823 Proposal for Revised Beach Renourishment Project Easement <br />Recommended Action: Discuss <br />Attachments: Commissioner's Memorandum <br />Draft Easement <br />Vice Chairman Earman recalled that at the March 8, 2022 meeting, the Board <br />elected to postpone the Sector 7 Beach Renourishment Project due to a lack of <br />sufficient signed easements. He continued, at the August 16th meeting, it was <br />the Board's consensus for Vice Chairman Earman to begin meeting with the <br />individual Sector 7 homeowners to gather information on how they felt the <br />County could best protect the beaches from erosion. He proposed an updated <br />version of a previously -used easement from the year 2009. <br />Vice Chairman Earman sought approval from the Board to take the revised <br />easement proposal back to the Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory <br />Committee (BSPAC) for their input. <br />In response to a question by Commissioner Adams, County Attorney Dylan <br />Reingold stated the difference between the proposed easement and the original <br />easement was the removal of the broader customary -use language replaced by <br />the reference to Section 161.141, Florida Statutes. <br />Indian River County Florida Page 14 <br />