My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
3/19/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:23:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FF_ <br />b00K 97 PAGF 64 <br />negotiated price are less than the estimate submitted in the FCT <br />application, a request for additional FCT funds to satisfy the 40% <br />match of the actual purchase cost is not necessary. <br />• Management Costs <br />Besides cost share, management cost is always an issue with <br />environmental lands acquisition. The FCT program, which is highly <br />competitive state-wide, awards points for projects based on the <br />provision of resource-based public access and.use facilities. In <br />order to qualify for FCT cost -share funding, the County obligated <br />itself in its, FCT application to provide limited access and <br />resource-based facilities on the subject property. <br />Specifically, conditions of the Conceptual Approval Agreement <br />include County provision of a limited boat dock (one or two slips), <br />nature trial, picnic area, and informational display. The County is <br />also obligated in the FCT Agreement to remove invasive exotic <br />vegetation, as applicable, and implement a resource management plan <br />in coordination with forestry and wildlife agencies. <br />A number of initial site improvements, including exotic plant <br />removal, and resource management (e.g., native plant revegetation), <br />can be paid for with bond referendum funds as part of.. -the property <br />acquisition. Improvements such as a limited boat dock will need to <br />be funded by a source other than referendum monies. Potential <br />funding sources include park development grants, county mitigation <br />funds, and tree removal violation funds. Also, staff has become <br />aware of Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />funding opportunities relating to exotic plant removal and native <br />plant restoration, which funding will be pursued. <br />Relating to long term management, the property will be incorporated <br />into the county -wide park system and managed by the County Parks <br />Division in coordination with county environmental planning staff. <br />Volunteer groups will be asked to assist the County with certain <br />aspects of property management such as nature trail up -keep, <br />Brazilian pepper control, and litter patrol. <br />County staff has initiated discussions with City of Vero Beach <br />staff regarding City assistance in management and related costs. As <br />reflected in the draft management plan, county staff plan to bring <br />this matter to the City Council to determine the extent of City <br />contribution. <br />For the Prang Island property, county staff has opted to have a <br />management plan (see attached) drafted by the county's <br />acquisition/management consultants, an option which is specified in <br />the County's contract with FloridAffinity, Inc. Page 21 of the <br />draft plan summarizes estimated management and development costs. <br />*Appraisals <br />In accordance with County Land Acquisition Guide and FCT <br />procedures, two independent appraisals were obtained (by -the FCT) <br />to determine an approved appraised value for the subject property. <br />The two appraisal firms selected were J.T. Namie & Associates, and <br />Aucamp, Dellenback, & Whitney. The appraisals were subsequently <br />certified by a review appraiser (Boyle Appraisal Service), as <br />required by the FCT. <br />The results of the two appraisals are summarized as follows. <br />March 19, 1996 <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.