Laserfiche WebLink
ox PAGE8,94, 7 <br />•Utility Impact Fee Financing Mechanism <br />For several years, the County utilities department has provided for the financing of water and <br />sewer impact fees. As structured, this process allows for ten year financing of utility impact fees <br />associated with county built projects and existing homes. Utility impact fees associated with <br />other types of projects may be financed over five years. <br />For utility impact fee financing, the interest rate charged is currently 8%2%. This rate is adjusted <br />annually by the Board of County Commissioners. The debt is amortized over the financed <br />period, with monthly billing by the Utilities Departmem To secure the debt, a lien is recorded <br />against the real property receiving the utility service, and this lien is subordinate to any bank lien <br />on the property. <br />To ensure that adequate revenue is available to make the capital improvements funded by water <br />and sewer impact fees, the utilities department . has a three tier approach. First, interfund <br />borrowing is used to fund capital improvements. Second, a bond issue backed by impact fee <br />assessments is used if interfund borrowing is not sufficient. The third tier involves doing a larger <br />bond issue, pledging impact fee revenue as well as some other revenue source. <br />Since establishing its impact fee financing mechanism, the utilities department has financed <br />$4,567,927 of impact fees. <br />ANALYSIS <br />For economic development purposes, allowing for the financing of traffic impact fees provides <br />two benefits. First, it enhances the County's pro -economic development image. Second, it <br />provides developers with another financing option for part of their project cost. <br />Traffic impact fees, however, differ significantly from water and sewer impact fees. These <br />differences not only affect how the financing is administered, but also affect the usefulness of <br />financing these fees. Generally, TIF financing will be less beneficial to applicants than water and <br />sewer impact fee financing. <br />• Developer Issues <br />Because traffic impact fees are almost always associated with new construction, TIF financing <br />may have limited benefits for developers. Since new construction generally requires financing <br />and since financial institutions consider financed impact fees as debt in calculating a maximum <br />loan to value ratio, financing impact fees usually reduces the amount of money that a developer <br />can borrow by the amount of the financed TIF. An exception where TIF financing would be <br />beneficial is where a developer has no other debt on his project. <br />Water and sewer impact fees, however, are different, since these fees are often financed for <br />existing projects that are retrofitted with County water and sewer. In this case, County financing <br />is beneficial because it provides a source of financing without affecting any other loans. <br />• Counil Issues <br />There are several County related issues that must be considered in financing traffic impact fees. <br />These include TIF district requirements, cash flow, default, and exposure. <br />• TIF District Limitation <br />As structured, the County's traffic impact fee ordinance establishes nine TIF benefit districts. <br />The ordinance requires that all revenues collected in a district be spent in that district. This <br />contrasts with water and sewer impact fees which are countywide in scope. <br />40 <br />April 23, 1996 <br />