My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/7/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
5/7/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/8/2015 3:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/07/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8m 9 7 SLE <br />TO: J.ames E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DI SION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />,v _ <br />Robert M. Keatig, A P " <br />Community Devel pmenZDirector <br />FROM: Stan Boling AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: April 30, 1996( <br />SUBJECT: SR 60 Corridor Plan Task Force <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of May 7, 1996. _ <br />BACKGROUND: <br />At its regular meeting of April 9, 1996, the Board of County <br />Commissioners directed staff to initiate development of a formal SR <br />60 Corridor Plan covering an area along SR 60 from 43rd Avenue to <br />102nd Avenue (see attachment #1). The initial step in the,plan <br />preparation process is for the Board to appoint a SR 60 'Task Force <br />that can work with staff to develop a SR 60 Corridor Plan. Other <br />subsequent steps in the plan preparation process include: a task <br />force "self -organization" meeting, public workshop meetings, <br />development of a recommended plan, review and recommendation of the <br />proposed plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and final <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. The Board is <br />now to consider appointment of a SR 60 Corridor Plan Task Force. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Since the April 9th meeting, 17 citizens have formally contacted <br />staff regarding apppintment to the task force. Staff's goal in <br />forming a recommended list of task force members was to find people <br />who are interested in serving on the task force and who have <br />relevant expertise or interest in the SR 60 corridor (e.g. <br />resident, business interest, property owner). In conjunction with <br />seeking representation of a variety of interests, staff also sought <br />to keep the total number of task force. members to a reasonable <br />size."'The size of the Wabasso Corridor Task Force seemed to work <br />well. That task force consisted of 15 appointed members, and <br />average meeting attendance was 10-11 members. <br />The following list of 17 potential SR 60 Corridor Plan Task Force <br />members includes persons who have expressed a desire to serve and <br />who represent a particular interest and/or have expertise in a <br />relevant field. <br />52 <br />MAY 79 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.