Laserfiche WebLink
40 <br />•0 <br />1. The LD -1 category is not consistent with the current <br />commercial zoning nor would it be consistent with a mobile home <br />zoning category. <br />Chairman Eggert explained to Mr. Simmons that he is <br />nonconforming now and the zoning would not effect him. <br />Mr. Simmons asked if it is not zoned commercial, why is he <br />paying taxes on commercial property? <br />Mr. Shearer stated that since 1982, the County's Land Use <br />Plan has designated this property as residential use. <br />Mr. Simmons stated he had a lady, Ms. Davis, come to his <br />property and made him move his mobile home that he was working on <br />and she said the home was on commercial property and it could not <br />stay there. He stated Ms. Davis had given him a certain length <br />of time to get it off or the County was going to charge him $250 <br />a day. <br />Chairman Eggert stated she thought the land use designation <br />was residential but zoned commercial because it was not brought <br />into.conormity. <br />Mr.. Keating asked Mr. Simmons if he had a mobile home on <br />this property? Mr. Keating stated Ms. Davis works for him and he <br />would investigate this. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if this mobile home was being used? <br />Mr. Simmons stated he was repairing it. <br />Chairman Eggert stated this is the problem then. If it were <br />a used mobile home in a mobile home park it would not have been <br />touched. An unused mobile home is considered in the same <br />category as a junked mobile home and therefore he would be asked <br />to move it. <br />Attorney Barkett stated that the proposal today is not <br />Gjeffecting his current use of the property. Under the Plan, <br />Attorney Barkett explained Mr. Simmon's current use is not in <br />conformance with the Land Use Plan, and under this Precise Land <br />Use Map, he still will not be in conformance. Attorney Barkett <br />stated Mr. Simmons is out of compliance in a different fashion. <br />17 <br />