1999-017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4D r • In Madison County v. Foxx, 636 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), the county struggled with imposing special assessments for solid waste collection and disposal, landfill closure, fire protection, and emergency medical and ambulance services. The assessments were imposed against property in different portions of the county. The fire assessment was effective in unincorporated areas only. The assessment for solid waste collection and disposal applied to property within the unincorporated area and within the municipality of Lee. The other two (2) assessments, for landfill closure and emergency medical and ambulance services, applied in the unincorporated areas and within the municipalities of Lee, Greenville and the City of Madison, but only if the governing board agreed to the special assessment by resolution. In the implementing ordinance imposing the challenged assessments, the County documented its uncertainty as to the statutory authority under which it was acting: Because the County was uncertain whether imposition of these special assessments dealing with garbage collection and disposal, landfill closure, and ambulance service, required the creation of a Municipat Service Taxing Unit (MSTU), or a Municipal Service Benefits unit (MSBU), or a special district, or apparently whether the County had to contract with the cities to provide the services, the County claimed authority to act under Article VIII(1)(1) of the Florida CorLstitution, section 125.01(1), section 125,01(1)(q)1., section 125.01(5)(a), and section 125.0101(2)). c�or firy pr otcction, the County claimred authority to act under Article VI11(1)(f) of the Florida Constitution, section 125.01(1), section 125,01(1)(q)2., and section 125,01(5)(x). None of these ordinances referenced section 125.01(1)(r), Florida statutes.' 'Recall that section 125.171(1){ry. Florida statutes, is She enumeration of the power to impose assessments generally,