Laserfiche WebLink
fe rhnICA) APprOSCIt <br />Page 9 <br />view (1' = 200 feet) and section view (.at 1000 foot spacing) drawings will be prepared for <br />two alternate configurations at each of the five Project areas (Sector 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7). The <br />cross-section drawings will indicate design templates, advance fill templates, adjusted <br />post -nourishment equilibrium profile, equilibrium We of fill, locations of hardbottom and the <br />borrow area location relative to the Project. <br />Task 3.3 Develop Project Cost Estimates <br />Probable costs of engineering design, permitting, construction, and past -Project <br />performance monitoring will be tabulated and presented in the report. Mitigation of <br />nearshore hardbottom resource impacts will be estimated and probable costs for this <br />item will be presented, Potential issues that could result in delays in permit acquisition <br />will be identified. A suggested timeline for completion of significant design, permitting, <br />bidding and construction milestones will be included in the report. <br />Construction costs will be estimated to including mobi lizationldemobil ization, unit costs <br />of sand excavation, delivery distances, and placement quantities, and mitigation and <br />phys callbiological monitoring, An evaluation of alternate construction sequencing of <br />Projects will be performed to evaluate the potential to reduce overall Project costs. All <br />such costs shall be based on the information attendant with the expected sand source <br />locations, hardbottom mapping studies and resultant artificial reef acreage's required for <br />Project mitigation and the FDEP's standard Project monitoring requirements. Cost <br />estimates will be developed in June 1999 for purposes of County planning purposes and <br />formulation of the County's financing plan to implement the BPP (cost estimate #1). It is <br />anticipated that three revisions of the project cost estimate will be required. Study <br />findings and Project design recommendations will be presented to staff, the public <br />through workshops, the Beach Advisory Committee and the County Commission, <br />Task 3.4 Beach restoration Destgn Memorandum Report <br />The Beach Restoration Design Memorandum Report will provide the information needed <br />to file and initiate the processing of the Project permits including developing design <br />beachfill templates, environmental resource mapping and sand characterization in <br />sufficient detail to support applications to the 'State and Federal agencies. This report <br />will detail the following: <br />* sand source investigation/geotechnical data and overlay mapping of features, <br />analyses of composite sand characteristics for alternate borrow area configurations <br />for each candidate sand source with borrow areas mapped, <br />♦ natural resource mapping, hardbottom area characterization and quadrats along <br />the nearshore area (to a depth of -18 feet) contiguous to each sand placement <br />area and nearshore zone fronting the adjacent beaches that extend 1,000 feet <br />north and 3,000 feet south of Project beach nourishment areas, <br />typical beach nourishment section view templates, unit fill quantities (cylft), design <br />beachfill quantities for each Project area and identified sand source including <br />overfill quantity estimates (if required) and development of cost estimates based on <br />the recommended sand sources, <br />t side scan maps and bathymetric maps for the identified candidate borrow areas, <br />graphics and exhibits for the permit pre -application meeting with the county, state <br />and federal agencies to submit the report for their review. <br />Plan and cross section views of beachfill template overlays on existing beach profile <br />data (with the results of the environmental resource mapping depicted as an <br />AutoCADf+GIS layer -controlled feature) will show the proximity of fill to existing natural <br />resources. If the character (relief, biodiversity and location relative to shore) of <br />nearshore hardbottom resources indicates a perceived immediate (direct burial by <br />beachfill) or secondary (longshore and cross -store redistribution of sand subsequent to <br />fill placement) impact to the resource, the total sand coverage acreage (both vertical <br />Qr� "V. d -W vP Vw"A Vi KC *,1 tit Na Mae Usti X"" <br />