Laserfiche WebLink
FINDINGS OF FACT: <br />THE PROPERTY APPRAISER PRESENTED <br />The Okaloosa County Property Appraiser presented by and through the testimony of Okaloosa County <br />Property Appraiser Counsel Loren Levy. Testified that the property is owned by and exempt entity and is <br />being used by another exempt entity in exchange for rent, market rent. Testified that there is a 2018 <br />court case called Genesis Ministries, a Santa Rosa County case, stands for the proposition that <br />ownership and use has to be by the same entity which is relevant to this instant matter. Testified that <br />the court said that if the entity that owned the property received rent for the lease disqualified the <br />property from receiving the exemption. Testified in the instant matter, the two entities at issue are not <br />related entities. Testified that the instant matter was one whereby the Florida Statute 196.192 is the <br />first issue of the matter before the Special Magistrate which is the general Exemptions from ad valorem <br />taxation statute. Testified that the statute has a two (2) prong test. Testified that the statute exempts <br />ownership with the specific language being "All property owned by an exempt entity, including <br />educational institutions, and used exclusively for exempt purposes shall be totally exempt from ad <br />valorem taxation" in the first prong. Testified that you must have exempt ownership, or ownership by an <br />exempt entity of the property as to the first prong along with use for exempt purposes. Testified that <br />the second prong is, with the specific language being, "All property owned by an exempt entity, <br />including educational institutions, and used predominantly for exempt purposes shall be exempted from <br />ad valorem taxation to the extent of the ratio that such predominant use bears to the nonexempt use." <br />Testified that, for clarity, the first prong stands for ownership of the land by an exempt entity used <br />exclusively for exempt purposes, and that the second prong stands for ownership by an exempt entity <br />used predominantly for exempt purposes shall be exempt from taxation if the use indeed charitable and <br />not market rent. Testified that the statute stands for the fact that one must look at physical and <br />economic uses of the property. <br />Testified that the Property Appraiser's presentation will be focusing on subsections 1 through 2 of <br />Florida Statute 196.196. Testified to the meaning of the language of the following: <br />196.196 Determining whether property is entitled to charitable, religious, scientific, or literary <br />exemption.— <br />(1) In the determination of whether an applicant is actually using all or a portion of its property <br />predominantly for a charitable, religious, scientific, or literary purpose, the following criteria shall be <br />applied: <br />(a) The nature and extent of the charitable, religious, scientific, or literary activity of the applicant, a <br />comparison of such activities with all other activities of the organization, and the utilization of the <br />property for charitable, religious, scientific, or literary activities as compared with other uses. <br />(b) The extent to which the property has been made available to groups who perform exempt <br />purposes at a charge that is equal to or less than the cost of providing the facilities for their use. Such <br />rental or service shall be considered as part of the exempt purposes of the applicant. <br />1(2) Only those portions of property used predominantly for charitable, religious, scientific, or literary <br />purposes are exempt. The portions of property which are not predominantly used for charitable, <br />religious, scientific, or literary purposes are not exempt. An exemption for the portions of property used <br />-30- <br />