1999-187 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

( easements, turbidity monitoring, hydrographic monitoring, revegetation and turtle monitoring. Other factors that must be considered in the development of public access for the application for state funding include: signage, dune overwalks, handicapped access, and facilities, including trash cans and public restrooms. Any additional requirements for state funding participation are stipulated in the agreement between the state and local governmental entity prior to receipt of state monies. These criteria apply to the Sector 5 project area and, in the future, will apply to Sector 3 project area for the sectors first renourishment. In addition to these qualifying criteria, the state considers projects which are constructed to improve sand bypassing (across inlets) to downdrift shorelines and shorelines where governments own all upland properties within a project area. The former is the basis for the 50 percent state funding participation in Sectorsl, 2 and 3 and the latter is the basis for the 100 percent state funding participation in Sector 1. The qualifying project costs in Sector 1 are based on 100 percent State BECK funding as government land fronts the entire Sector 1 shoreline. Sector 2 qualifies for 50 percent State BECP, for a total qualifying cost of $4,554,087 in Sectors 1 and 2. These qualifying costs are based on the project cost estimates described previously in Chapter 4 of this report (i.e. Tables 11-15). The qualifying project costs in Sectors 3 and 5 are based on 50 percent State BECP funding, or $1,864,858 and $2,308,478, respectively. State BECP funds, as a primary revenue source, will provide a total of $8,727,423 over the proposed 3-4 year project implementation period. These costs includa the costs of construction, field investigations, design, permitting and monitoring, and survevinq. 98.9NNHSIREP0RT4)+W TM01 nVME 47