My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-187
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
1990's
>
1999
>
1999-187
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2023 2:37:33 PM
Creation date
8/21/2023 2:35:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Miscellaneous
Approved Date
07/20/1999
Control Number
1999-187
Subject
Beach Preservation Plan Economic Analysis Phase II
Funding Sources and Financial Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to <br />do <br />Alternately, if the County dedicates $1,000,000 to fund the beach improvement <br />projects on an annual basis over the next 5 years, this source of revenue will <br />generate $5,000,000. This source of revenue combined with the State BECP <br />and TDT funds described above provide $16,555,073 in total funds. Table 20 <br />provides a summary of the expected monthly contributions from these sources of <br />revenue, assuming an annual dedication of $1,000,000 in from the local <br />infrastructure surtax to pay the costs of the initial work to construct the four (4) <br />beach restoration projects. An alternative variable rate annual dedication that <br />results in a total $5,000,000 from the local infrastructure surtax is given in Table <br />21. Special assessments are proposed to fund the balance of $1,130,467 in <br />project costs. This source of revenue is proposed to pay in accordance with the <br />associated distribution of storm protection benefits to Sectors 2, 3, 5 and 7. A <br />description of the resulting assessments is given in the following sections. <br />5.5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS <br />Special assessments are a home rule revenue source that counties may use to <br />fund local improvements or essential services. As established by rase law, two <br />requirements exist for the imposition of a valid special assessment: (1) the <br />property assessed must derive a special benefit from the improvement or service <br />provided and (2) the assessment must be fairly and reasonably apportioned <br />among the properties that receive the special benefit. City of Boca Raton v. <br />State, 595 So. 2d at 29. If a special assessment ordinance withstands the <br />special benefit and fair apportionment tests, the assessment is not a tax and the <br />judicial focus is then on whether the methods prescribed by the home rule <br />ordinance were substantially followed. Madison Counhf v. Foxx, 636 So. 2d 39 <br />(Fla. 1st DCA 1994). An assessment may provide funding for either capital <br />expenditures or the operational costs of services, provided that the property, <br />which is subject to the assessment, derives <br />WO&WHSMEPOHTIOM TMO199/Wr <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.