1999-215 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SCHEDULE 3.16 Compliance with Laws 1. Processing Fee Litigation a. Missouri -Jerry Stewart, individually and n class representative vs. Falcon Cable Holding Group, L.P., Falcon Holding Group, Inc., Ewer Communications Corp., Enter Cable Corp. and David Huntsman. Filed in Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, MO (later moved to U.S. District Court East in the District of Missouri, filed January 28, 1998. Class Action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief claiming the defendants alleged late charge for cable bills after the due date is a penalty, and is illegal. b. Illinois -Don Trambley and Nona Trambley on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated vs. Falcon Holding Group, L.P. Falcon Holding Group, Inc. Enstar Communications Corp. and Ensmr Cable Corp. filed in U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois, December 28,1998. Class Action compliant alleging defendants unlawfully assessed charges. Plaintiffs petitioned for declaritoryjudgementfording that the late charge imposed by defendant's void and unlawful, and, at penalty, the defendant be enjoined from continuing to assess the late charge on plaintiffs, c. Oregon- Sonny Dickey on behalfof himself and other subscribers in Oregon vs. Falcon Cable Systems Company Il, L.P. filed in the Circuit Court of Douglas County, Oregon on February 4, 1999. The action seeks restitution and injunctive relief in connection with the Company's imposition of late fees. Discovery has not commenced. 2. A matter is pending with the Santa Clam County (San Jose) District Attorney's office that relates to complaints, raised by subscribers, relating to certain procedures followed by Signal Audit Services ("SAS"), a contractor of Falcon upon discovering an illegal black box in a subscriber's home. 3. The Smte of Washington has commenced an administrative action arising out of the failure of Falcon Telecable to register as a contractor with Washington Contractors Board. V SCHEDULE 3.16 —Page 1