Laserfiche WebLink
A TRUE COPY <br />CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE <br />RYAN L. BUTLER, CLERK <br />• Sub -Recipient's local procurement policy. <br />To the extent that one standard is more stringent than another, the Sub -Recipient shall follow the <br />more stringent standard. For example, if a state statute imposes a stricter requirement than a <br />federal regulation, then the Sub -Recipient shall adhere to the requirements of the state statute. <br />The State of Florida procurement policy and procedure is as follows: <br />Amount <br />Documentation Required <br />Shall be carried out using good purchasing practices which may include <br />Up to $2,499 <br />certification of written or telephone quotes <br />$2,500 but less <br />Submit summary of 2 (minimum) written quotes, signed by the vendor <br />than 35,000 <br />representative. <br />For vendors not on STC; submit documentation of Invitation to Bid <br />> $35,000 <br />Process (ITB), Request for Proposal (RFP) or Intent to Negotiate (ITN) <br />All Sole Source <br />FDEM pre -approval is required <br />Alternative <br />Commodities or Services available to the State via outside contract <br />Contract Source <br />vehicle. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted along with <br />additional quotes if GSA 70 or GSA 84. <br />Formal Competitive Solicitations: $35,000 and above and not available on STC include <br />Invitation to Bid (ITB), Request for Proposal (RFP), or Invitation to Negotiate (ITN). Each <br />requires a Scope of Work that meets all statutory requirements and formal posting or publication <br />processes. Subrecipients shall submit their formal solicitation documentation and <br />subsequent vendor selection documentation for approval prior to initiating any work. <br />The Division shall review the solicitation and provide comments, if any, to the Sub -Recipient. <br />Consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.325, the Division shall review the solicitation for compliance with <br />the procurement standards outlined in 2 C.F.R. § 200.318 through 200.327 as well as Appendix II <br />to 2 C.F.R. Part 200. Consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(k), the Division shall not substitute its <br />judgment for that of the Sub -Recipient. While the Sub -Recipient does not need the approval of <br />the Division in order to publish a competitive solicitation, this review may allow the Division to <br />identify deficiencies in the vendor requirements or in the commodity or service specifications. <br />The Division's review and comments shall not constitute an approval of the solicitation. <br />Regardless of the Division's review, the Sub -Recipient remains bound by all applicable laws, <br />regulations, and agreement terms. If during its review the Division identifies any deficiencies, <br />then the Division shall communicate those deficiencies to the Sub -Recipient as quickly as <br />possible. <br />If the Sub -Recipient publishes a competitive solicitation after receiving comments from the <br />Division that the solicitation is deficient, then the Division may: <br />• Terminate this Agreement in accordance with the provisions outlined in paragraph <br />(17) above; and, <br />• Refuse to reimburse the Sub -Recipient for any costs associated with that <br />solicitation. <br />Examples of when to use each method: <br />Invitation to Bid: Procurement by sealed bidding is a method where bids are publicly solicited <br />through formal advertising. It is when a Sub -Recipient can establish precise specifications for a <br />commodity or service defining, with specificity, as further outlined in the scope of work. <br />49 <br />