1999-269 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C� 04fZ9/99 TRU 06;29 FAX SIJ 246 8063 NALCOL'X FIRNIE INC. 00? I Malcom Phare, Inc. Work Scope and Priced Proposal Indian River County, Florida April 28,1"9 Introduction This work scope and not -to -exceed budget estimate is Lased upon our understanding that Maico m Pimic's role, as ctuready envisioned, will include art analysis of a mass burn waste -to -energy optic n, an assessment of the technical viability of a proposed Ocean Spray incinerator to process cerTA n waste types, and attendance by appropriate Malcolm Pirnie staff at pre -determined meetings (including site visits to support our technical responsibilities on this project). The following three tasks have been developed based upon aur current understanding of the preje :t: Task 1.0 - Estimate Capital and Operating Cost of a Mass Burn Waste-to—Enerrgy Facility. T'as'k 2.0 - Evaluate the Technical Feasibility of a Proposed Ocean Spray Incinerator to Aect pt and Process Certain Types of County Waste. Task 3.0 - Attend Meetings and Conduct Site Visits (a combination of 4 mectingslsite visits has been assumed in preparing our price proposal). Task 1.0 Estimatc Capital and Operating Lost of a. Mass Burn Waste-to-F.ner;gy Facility file objective of this task is to develop an estimate of the capital and operating costa associated wth the implementation of a mass burn waste -to -energy facility. 'Ibis will include troth capital a,id operating costs that will be provided to Glace and Radcliffe for inclusion in their life cycle cr st analysis. The estimate will also include mi overview of implementation costs that are usually av ounted for as a qualifying capital cost in a bond resolution. In addition, as a component oft to olierating cost, the estimate will provide the estimated quantities of ash residue and by-pass wa to that will require landfilling. Malcolat pirrsie will develop the quantities in terms of tonnage aatd cubic yards, and calculate the air space required for disposal for the twenty year operating peric J. Once. we ltave identified the required air space, Glace and Radcliffe will provide the cost estirnpte for disposal that will be inserted into their life cycle cost analysis, Malcolm l'irnic's analysis w Il bo limited to the cost of waste -to -energy. In order to develop the estimate, the following cc it components will be considered: Capital and. Operating Construction cast ofa mass bum waste -to -energy facility iltat meets current state and fedei al emission requirernents, including Florida's mercury rule;