Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Mitigation — Contiguous tracts known as the SL Sebastian [IUD and AGC <br />Industrial Tract contain about 40 acres of occupied habitat and about 50 acres of <br />unoccupied scrub habitat. The remaining LIFIC011111littCd occupied and unoccupied habitat <br />within the Wabasso Scrub Conservation Area (about 25 acres), Ali additional 5 acres of <br />scrub (presumably unoccupied) is proposed to be acquired and added to the Wabasso <br />Scrub tract, Five families are known to occupy diese lands. About 90 acres of occupied <br />habitat and 50 acres of unoccupied habitat, and live scrub jay families would be protected <br />under this proposal. <br />By comparison, implementation of the previous conservation plan would have resulted in <br />alteration ofabout 47 acres of habitat while 115 acres of occupied habitat would have been <br />conserved and managed. Only four additional families would have been lost while 16 would <br />have been protected. The County's cut <br />-rent mitigation proposal would adversely affect 84 acres <br />and protect and manage about 80 acres. Seven filrniliss w(.uld be lost while only five Farnifies <br />would be protected. <br />Though neither plan provides extreme benefits to scrub habitat beyond that currently available, <br />the proposed mitigation plan results in substantial additional losses ol'scrub habitat and scrub <br />jays. Based on these estimates, the current mitigation proposal provides long-term protection for <br />only five scrub jay families as well as for those families that may eventually occupy publicly <br />held scrub that is currently overgrown and unoccupied. In short, the current proposal could <br />result in an additional loss of'65 percent of the renmining scrub jays in northern Indian River <br />County. Added to losses since 1991, the proposal and past adverse affects would result in all 80 <br />percent loss of'scrubjays. <br />Oil October 4. 1996 f -AVS staffniet ,vidi you to discuss ramifications of the COLlflt3'*s recent <br />decision to terminate acquisition of scrub habitat in Sebastian Highlands. According to our <br />meeting notes. it was suggested that the C'OLIMV pursue any and all possible acquisition and <br />management options available to offset the additional adverseaffects that housing construction in <br />Unit 17 will have on Horida scrub jays, Although your letter indicates the County will not <br />pursue the 34 AGC lots in Unit 17, subsequent conversations with you suggest acquisition may <br />still be sought. We support this effort and believe the 34 AGC lots, in combination with Pelican <br />Elementary School scrub, may provide enough suitable habitat to rilininlize the adverse affects of <br />habitat fragmentation title to losses in the remainder of Unit 17. These scrub parcels, it'properly <br />managed, may be essential -stepping stones" for the dispersal of.scrLIbjUVS front and to northern <br />Indian River County, <br />After reviewing tile COLMIX'S current proposal. \Nc found that acquisition of live acres ol'scrub <br />has been added to the mitigation nicasures proposed during development of earlier conservation <br />plans. Other possible actions that could benefit scrub jays, but were not addressee! in the current <br />proposal include: <br />• Development of individual scrub nianagvniciu. plans for the airport, Sebastian golf course, <br />3 <br />