Laserfiche WebLink
El <br />U <br />` is labor intensive and requires negotiating heavy equipment. In addition, the long- <br />term effects of mechanical management actions to the scrub plant community are <br />not fully understood and must be used carefully (Schmalzer et a1. 1999). Even more <br />significant, per acre management costs for maintaining or restoring remnant scrub <br />in suburban areas, are comparatively more expensive than habitat management <br />j prescriptions on large parcels of land in undeveloped scenarios. <br />F` In consideration of the multiple project constraints and limitations listed above, and <br />at the recommendation of the Indian River County Land Acquisition Advisory <br />Committee (LAAC), the IRC Board voted in September 1996 to reject the <br />acquisition of Phase II of the SSCA project. This decision halted all acquisition <br />efforts by Indian River County of the Sebastian Highlands Unit 17 platted lots <br />comprising the SSCA (Indian River County, October 17, 1996 correspondence to <br />the FWS). At the subsequent urging of the FWS, Indian River County did complete <br />the purchase of a block of 34 contiguous lots in Unit 17. The FWS stated that the <br />34 AGC lots, in combination with Pelican Elementary School scrub, may <br />provide enough suitable habitat to minimize the adverse effects of habitat <br />fragmentation due to losses in the remainder of Unit 17, These scrub parcels, if <br />properly managed, may be essential "stepping stones" for dispersal of scrub -jays <br />from and to northern Indian River County..." (FANS, November 12, 1996 <br />correspondence to Indian River County). These 34 AGC lots, referred to herein as <br />the Sebastian Highlands Scrub Conservation Area were acquired by Indian River <br />County and are included in combination with the Pelican Island Elementary School <br />scrub as part of the proposed Sebastian HCP Scrub -Jay Habitat Compensation <br />Areas located in Unit 17 of Sebastian Highlands. <br />Implementation of Alternative 3 may have served to increase population persistence <br />probability of the south subpopulation, however the persistence probability of this <br />subpopulation will always be low because of the extensive fragmentation that <br />presently characterizes this area. Appropriate management of optimal scrub -jay <br />habitat conditions within the fragmented scrub lots would have been extremely <br />difficult due to the multiple residential homes adjoining the SSCA project area. <br />Alternative 3 was determined to be infeasible due primarily to economic and habitat <br />management constraints imposed by present-day conditions. <br />70 <br />