8/13/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 2, 1996: TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Directo AND Roger D. Cain, P.E County Engineer J FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, , 4civ Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to 26th Street from 66th Avenue to a point 2,588 lineal feet West of 66th Avenue DATE: August 2, 1996 DESCRIPTION AND CONDI'T'IONS On July 23, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 96-77 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to 26th Street, 2,588 lineal feet west of .66th Avenue. This is a Public Works Department initiated public improvement assessment, all of the right-of-way has been obtained except for the Bates Grove Property, which is currently being acquired through Courtproceedings. On July 23, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 96-78 setting the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for August 13,. 1996. Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners move to approve the assessment roll, and confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the August 13, 1996 Public Hearing.. Revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded to Chairman of the Board for signature. The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are available for viewing in the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioner's Office. • - Public Works Director Jim Davis advised that the cost of the project is being split between the County, 50%, and the benefitted owners, 50%. On the assessment roll, Seminole Venture's assessment is listed as being $11,468.67. Mr. Caldwell, the attorney for Seminole Venture, asked staff to remove that assessment and complete the purchase of the 66th Avenue right-of-way from Seminole Venture. There are 3 options available: (1) purchase the 66th Avenue right-of-way and compensate Seminole Venture; (2) allow Seminole Venture a density credit with permission to develop all units regardless of the right-of-way; and (3) allow Seminole Venture a traffic impact fee credit toward development. Commissioner Eggert questioned whether removing Seminole Venture from the assessment roll would affect the other property owners, and Director Davis felt that Seminole Venture should be kept on the assessment roll at this time and credit that amount AUGUST 13, 1996 47 BOOK°lalu