My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/27/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
8/27/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:50 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:57:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/27/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
boa 98 F�,,LsE 933 <br />Director Keating touched on other elements which are not final <br />including recreation. It is difficult to deal with levels of <br />service because the County and the cities provide recreational <br />facilities and funding. It is a complex task to determine who pays <br />for and who gets credit for what. While extensive work has already <br />been done, staff may conclude that it will need more study. <br />With respect to the intergovernmental coordination element, <br />Director Keating recommended that some of the intergovernmental <br />coordination be formalized and focus be placed on eliminating <br />enclaves; working with the cities to develop annexation plans; and <br />eliminating the current policy of considering changing to a <br />"charter county" as it does not appear to have many advantages for <br />the County. <br />Director Keating advised that a great deal of work has gone <br />into the preparation of this draft EAR and staff feels pretty <br />comfortable with it. They expect to be doing a lot more before it <br />comes back on December 10th for final approval and authorization to <br />send it to DCA. He asked that the Board members submit their <br />comments so they may be given to the Planning & Zoning Commission <br />for their meeting on September 12th, and asked for concurrence to <br />schedule some workshops in the fall for additional input. <br />Commissioner Eggert advised that she had already called him <br />with her comments, but wished to follow up on his statement about <br />annexation and eliminating enclaves. She assumed that in his <br />conversations on these topics he was carefully considering the <br />effect on emergency services. <br />Commissioner Bird suggested that before the map is revised <br />staff check with St. Johns River Water Management District <br />regarding some of their acquisitions in the county. He also felt <br />there is little opportunity in the county for a family to fulfill <br />the "American dream" to buy an acre or two. Not many one or two <br />acre lots exist and they are difficult to create. <br />Commissioner Eggert was certain it was true and recalled that <br />having one or two acre lots was one of the things sacrificed in <br />dealing with the DCA in 1989/90 that has really been too bad. <br />Commissioner Tippin remarked that DCA has not changed their <br />outlook on it either. At one time DCA praised the county for the <br />low density and green space, but now the same agency is saying that <br />urban sprawl has been created. <br />Chairman Adams agreed with Commissioner Bird and thought maybe <br />we need to change the 5 acres per unit. She felt that the logical <br />32 <br />August 27, 1996 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.