My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/11/2024
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04/11/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2024 10:43:03 AM
Creation date
4/15/2024 10:38:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/11/2024
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Value Adjustment Board Final Meeting (VAB) - 2023 Tax Year
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />Findings of Fact for Petition 2023-030: <br />The Appraiser Special Magistrate (SM) conducted a hearing that occurred on Nov 15, 2023 for the correctness of th� <br />2023 Just/Market Value of 450 Beach Rd #125 (32-40-07-00022-0030-00125.0) in Vero Beach. The Special 1 <br />Magistrate, clerk (Terri) and representatives from the Indian River County Property Appraisers Office (PAO) were <br />physically present in the hearing room. On a conference call was Stephen Boyle the representative for David Coolid�e <br />III the petitioner (PET). Both parties presented evidence in support of their opinions for the subject value. <br />+ <br />The PAO evidence consisted of a cover page, list of evidence, information request letter, evidence exchange 12D-9.00 <br />document, methodology and consideration page, 193.011 Factors to consider document, case law pages, subject <br />property card, subject photo, comparable grid, location map of subject/comparables and comparable property cards. <br />1 <br />15% cos (cost of sale) adjustment was considered. <br />The PET evidence consisted of an appraisal on a Fannie Mae 1073/Freddie Mac 465 form and four additional pages f <br />subject photos. <br />Upon examination of the evidence submitted, the subject is two condominium units that have been combined into on <br />large unit. The two separate living areas appear to have been joined by a circular staircase. The units can be separate <br />back to original. The subject has been renovated/updated. <br />The PET provided an appraisal report with five sales. Four of the five were shared with the PAO. <br />The PET additional sale (sale 4) that was not shared by the PAO was due to being a single-family detached dwelling <br />with no ocean/beach views. It may have a large parcel which is a non -factor as it not comparable to the subject other <br />than its size above 3000 sf. The PET did not apply an inferior view due to the large parcel and being east of AIA <br />which are not factors that cancel out the water views. j <br />PET sale 1 was added to the PAO sales as comparable 8. This was a large dwelling that is a townhouse with a distant <br />water view being back off the beach some. This sale has a private pool shared with the adjoining townhouse unit.Th <br />subject buildings of 450 Beach Rd share a large pool for the three buildings and the other buildings have pools forth <br />residents. <br />The other three sales from the PET were condo units that were smaller due to the subject being combined from two j <br />units. <br />The PET applied adjustments in their grid with comments that were referenced from the John's Island private sales <br />office. The PET did not provide any of the physical/digital data for verification of the adjustments for this hearing. <br />The PET commented on some of the PAO sales selling over list price which is indicative of an increasing trend which <br />contradicts his other comments of the market being sideways after March 2022. <br />The PAO provided eight sales which shared 4 with the PET. The PAO had seven condo unit sales and also included th� <br />PET townhouse sale 1 as their 8th sale. +. <br />The PAO presented their valuation based on a price per sf. The sales as discussed at the hearing have various levels of <br />updating with most being similar high quality like the subject. The PET appraisal clearly shows the subject being <br />renovated with high quality finishes. <br />The subject does not suffer from functional obsolescence being combined of two units as it has two kitchens, 5.1 <br />bathrooms, 5 bedrooms which if re -divided the units would be similar to the other units in the project at 2000+/- sf. <br />The PAO had 8 sales which ranged from $1,260 to $2,238 per sf. Utilizing the price per sf of all 8 sales returns a valui <br />of $5,575,001 for the subject size after the 15% cos is applied. <br />The PET 5 sales had a price per sf range from $1,177 to $2,238 per sf. The 5 sales return a value of $5,284,861 for th4 <br />subject after the 15% cos. i <br />The SM noted in the data that the $2,238 price per sf sale is much higher than the other sales lending support of this 11 <br />sale being a high outlier. PET sale 4 which was the detached single family with no water views was the low price per j <br />sf at $1,177 per sf. <br />Utilizing the six condo units (removing the high $2,238 sf and the shared townhouse unit) returns a value of <br />$5,435,127 after the 15% cos. The six sales plus the shared townhouse sale returns a value of $5,276,249 after the 150rl <br />cos. <br />The SM did not have supporting data for any of the comparables to support condition adjustments'. The comparables <br />submitted appear to have varying levels of updating based on their sale prices/size. There would possibly be some <br />variation for views/floor & building locations. <br />The subject does have a direct east water view with no obstructions, even on the first floor. The subject 1st floor patios <br />were enclosed which the PET included in the GLA (PAO most likely does not include in the property card). The <br />2023-030 Page 2 of 3 <br />-30- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.