My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/11/2024
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04/11/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2024 10:43:03 AM
Creation date
4/15/2024 10:38:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/11/2024
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Value Adjustment Board Final Meeting (VAB) - 2023 Tax Year
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The PA presented 4 comparable :sales most of which were single tenant office or <br />retail buildings (only 3 of the sales were considered applicable as one was sold for <br />land value): The 3 sales indicated a range froinf $224 SF to $634 SF. No -cost of <br />sale adjustment was shown or applied.:The range of the sale supported the- PA's <br />belief that the subject's assessed value of $210: 9' or $20-1 SF was reasonable. <br />The PA presented an income approach. The PA use a market rental rate of $20.00 <br />SF NNN. The rent rate was applied to the 1_,002 SFof GBA and resulted: in an <br />estimate of annual.rent (PGI) of $20;040. A: 5% vacancy and collection lass was <br />applied to the PGI for an EGI of $19,038; Expense of $2.09: SF or. $2,094: (11% of <br />EGI due to the NNN lease) were deducted and :resulted :in a NOI of $.16,944. The <br />net operating income was capitalized at 7.0"x'0: (no tax load). This indicated a <br />preliminary value of $242,055 and was rounded to: $240,00:0. <br />The PA made no deduction for the Cost of Sale (COS)in the. income approach.:: <br />The PA concluded that the subject's assessment of $210,72$ is well below the <br />indicated value by the income approach. (It is noted that, if the PA had deducted a <br />15% COS, as shown on the DR -493, from the preliminary value of $242;055, it <br />would have resulted in a just value indication of :$205,747:) <br />Two rent comps, one from LoopNet and one from the MLS, were provided to <br />support the rental rate. The comparables ranged from $19.00 SF NNN to $30.00 <br />SF NNN. This supported the use of $20 SF NNN for the subj ect. The balance. of <br />the support for the income approach was from the Commercial Market Insights <br />Report by the National Association of Realtors.:: <br />Summary of evidence presented by the petitioner: <br />The petitioner valued the subject property with:' an income approach. The' petitioner <br />utilized a market rental rate of $14.00 SF NNN and applied it to the gross building <br />area of 1,002 SF This resulted in a PGI of $14,028. A vacancy and collection loss <br />of 1016/0 was applied and indicated an EGI of $1'2,625.Operating expenses of . <br />$1,263 (10% of EGI), including real estate:taxes, were deducted and.indcated a <br />NOI of $11,363. The NOI was capitalized: at 7.0% (no tax load). This indicated a <br />preliminary value of $162,324. A 15% cost of -sale was made for the Ist and 8'h <br />criteria and indicated a just value of $137,975: This.was the requested just value. <br />The petitioner presented: 2 rent comparables from: CoStar to support the income <br />approach inputs. <br />2023-043 38 - Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.