Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT B - PAGE 2 <br />b. Deleting the post tensioning will allow the bridge to be widened in the future <br />much easier with the same type of superstructure construction <br />c. Deleting the asphalt will eliminate future repairs and replacement of the <br />asphalt on the bridge deck and a better joint system <br />5. We will change the design of the concrete sheeting behind the end bents to a steel <br />sheet pile wall that was proposed on 431 Ave but was rejected for cost reasons. <br />a. The reason for this change is the jetting of the concrete sheeting in the North <br />relief canal would cause substantial water quality issues. Jetting is the only <br />method that can be used to put in concrete sheeting. The steel sheets AZ12- <br />700 10' long can be driven behind the cap. The banks of the relief canal will <br />be lined with concrete rubble to also protect from erosion. We will obtain the <br />permit from the Indian River Farms Control District for these changes. These <br />changes are consistent with other projects approved by the district. <br />6. We will design the bridge to the 2021 standards versus the 2015 standards it is <br />presently designed under. <br />7. We will design the substructure caps and the bridge deck to be phased to allow for the <br />maximum amount of bridge construction in the 1St phase of the project. This will <br />allow just a small piece of the bridge to be constructed in the 21 phase of the project <br />which will have the shortest construction time frame. <br />8. Cone & Graham would accept this as a lump sum contract and agree that no <br />additional charges for this design change or quantity errors would be charged to the <br />county based on this change. <br />9. We are proposing all these changes at a no cost change order to the county. We have <br />a couple of options on how to facilitate this design change. <br />1. We can pay the engineer (WGI) for this Design build of the bridge <br />a. IRC would have to cover the cost of the review of the design changes <br />as we would have to submit the phasing plans for review under the <br />original design. <br />2. IRC could deduct the cost of the redesign from WGI from our contract to <br />reimburse WGI for their work. <br />We would request a meeting as soon as possible to discuss these changes and the time to <br />complete these changes in order to sequence construction. <br />Sincerely, <br />Randal <br />Digitally signed <br />by Randall <br />Cropp <br />Randy Cropp I C ro p p Date: 2021.06.03 <br />Cone & Graham 08:15:08 04'00' <br />East Coast Division Manager <br />Cc: Bill Adams, P.E. Consor (wadams@consoreng.com) <br />Kelly Cowger, P.E. Consor (kcowgeraconsoren .com) <br />RE <br />