Laserfiche WebLink
people didn't understand, it is because they didn't listen to the <br />explanations. This is not something that suddenly popped up this <br />year. That was part of the talks given at various places in the <br />county. <br />Commissioner Bird recalled that he made several of those <br />speeches and believed that if we had told people that we were going <br />to spend $5 million to lease 100 acres of land, he was not sure <br />whether that referendum would have passed. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt the goal was conservation and that <br />was important, too. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION and the Motion <br />passed by a 4-1 vote, Commissioner Bird dissenting. <br />COPY OF PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF OPTION AGREEMENT IS <br />ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />DEED' ON FILE <br />AWARD BID #6081 - NORTH COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANT <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/3/96: <br />DATE: September 3, 1996 <br />TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator <br />H.T. "Sonny" Dean, General Services Director <br />FROM: Fran Boynton -Powell, Purchasing Manager iv <br />SUBJECT: Award Bid #6081/North County Reverse Osmosis Plant <br />Utilities Department <br />BACKGROUND INFORMATION <br />Bid Opening Date: <br />Advertising Dates: <br />Advertisement Mailed to: <br />Replies: <br />August 21, 1996 <br />July 16, 23, 31, August 13, 1996 <br />Twenty-seven (27) Vendors <br />Eight (8) Vendors <br />53 50DA 99 %a '1731 <br />September 10, 1996 <br />