My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-255A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2000
>
2000-255A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2024 2:00:45 PM
Creation date
7/12/2024 1:57:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Miscellaneous
Approved Date
08/22/2000
Control Number
2000-255A
Agenda Item Number
7.B.
Entity Name
IRC Environmental Planning
Subject
Manatee Protection & Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan <br />BOAT FACILITIES DEMAND <br />Marinas <br />The University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research projects population for <br />Indian River County to reach 124,400 by the year 2005. In comparison, FDEP projects <br />recreational boat registrations to increase to 9,128 in the year 2005. While population growth <br />is projected to increase by nearly 23.7 ;percent between 1995 to 2005, FDEP projects that <br />recreational vessel registrations will increase only by 8.9 percent during the same period, and <br />commercial vessel registrations will remain at the 1995 level. Based on observed increases <br />(15.5 percent) in boat registrations from 1990 to 1997, the FDEP projection for 2005 may be <br />considered a low estimate. <br />As presented in the "existing conditions" portion of this Plan, recreational boat registration in <br />Indian River County increased by 15.4 percent between 1990 and 1997. During this same <br />period, the population of Indian River County increased by 11.1 percent. To determine if any <br />correlation could be established between boating registration and population increase, <br />historical boating registration and population trends were analyzed. There is a strong <br />relationship between these two values and it can be expected that as the population increases <br />boat registration will also increase. <br />In analyzing the need for additional wet slips, it is important to consider the number of boats <br />registered in the county that would potentially utilize a marina. For planning purposes, the <br />following recreational watercraft can be categorically excluded: canoes, PWCs, and <br />recreational boats ander 16 feet (Class 1) in length. These watercraft, which accounted for <br />4129 boats or approximately 48 per cent of all boat registrations in 1997-1998, are typically <br />stored at places other than wet marinas. Excluding the previously mentioned classes of <br />watercraft reduces potential demand for wet slips to 4378. Furthermore, it can be assumed that <br />all commercial vessels and approximately 50 per cent of Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 vessels <br />are moored at a marina. Based on this assumption, the total of number of vessels stored at a <br />marina was 2189 in 1997-1998. The January 2000 marina survey recorded a total of 1128 <br />wetslips of which 724 were occupied (64 per cent). This is significantly less than predicted <br />based upon the above noted assumptions, <br />Based on data from FDEP predicted boat registration data, the January 2000 marina survey, <br />and the assumption that no additional wet slips are constructed by 2005, 70 per cent or 788 (an <br />8.9 per cent increase from 1990) of the available wet slips will be occupied in 2005. Although <br />these data indicate there is no need to increase the number wet slips by 2005, these data do not <br />take market considerations into account. One market consideration is the size of wet slips. <br />For example, these data do not indicate whether or not there will be a need to construct wet <br />slips capable of accommodating larger vessels. Furthermore, these data do not account for the <br />distribution of wet slips between residential and commercial marinas. According to the FIT <br />boating study, commercial and recreational marinas generally have a greater percentage of wet <br />slip occupancy than residential marinas. This observation is even more apparent during the <br />peak season (January to March). For example, the Vero Beach Municipal Marina is currently <br />near 100 per cent capacity, whereas most residential marinas average about 50 per cent <br />capacity. <br />Community Development Department page 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.