My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-255A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2000
>
2000-255A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2024 2:00:45 PM
Creation date
7/12/2024 1:57:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Miscellaneous
Approved Date
08/22/2000
Control Number
2000-255A
Agenda Item Number
7.B.
Entity Name
IRC Environmental Planning
Subject
Manatee Protection & Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4W <br />Indian River County Manatee Protection and Baaifng Safety Comprehensive I4tanngenient Plan <br />Zone 6 <br />The potential for siting and expansion of marinas in the portion of Zone 6 lying north of the <br />City of Vero Beach is restricted since the Town of Indian River Shores' existing zoning <br />regulations do not permit the location of marinas within any zoning district. Also, three (3) <br />watercraft -related manatee mortalities have occurred in the vicinity of John's Island and one <br />(1) near the Vero Beach Municipal Marina. The existing 1:100 powerboat/shoreline density <br />ratio should be retained for the portion of Zone 6 lying within the Town of Indian River <br />Shores. <br />The portion of Zone 6 lying within the City of Vero Beach is conducive to the expansion of <br />existing boat facilities. Also, the probability of watercraft impact to manatees is low since <br />manatee use in this area is low. Furthermore, natural resource constraints, including the <br />presence of seagrass and shoreline vegetation, are minimal. Due to a lack of natural resource <br />constraints and proposed expansion plans, a maximum shoreline/ density ratio should not be <br />applied to the portion Zone 6 lying within the City of Vero Beach. <br />Zone 7 <br />Generally, Zone 7 is conducive to the siting and expansion of boat facilities. Subject to market <br />demand, there are plans to expand the Grand Harbor marina by 200 wet slips for a total of 344 <br />slips. Although on -water traffic originating from the Grand Harbor marina must travel <br />approximately 15 miles to the Sebastian Inlet, the type of watercraft moored in this marina <br />generally travel in a linear pattern within the ICW, Furthermore, the Grand Harbor Marina <br />basin was designed to accommodate future expansion with no adverse impact on coastal <br />wetlands or shoreline vegetation. <br />Due to sparse seagrass beds, there appears to be little manatee use of the IRL west of the ICW, <br />south of Hole in the Wall Island to the Lost Tree Islands, with the only exception being <br />manatee use of the Grand Harbor Marina. Therefore, the overall probability of watercraft <br />impacts to manatees north of the Merrill -Barber bridge or near existing boat facilities within <br />"Lone 7 is low. Due to an overall lack of natural resource constraints and proposed expansion <br />plans, a maximum shoreline/ density ratio should not be applied to the portion of Zone 7 lying <br />within the City of Vero Beach. <br />One potential site for marina development is located south of the Grand Harbor Development. <br />Although the upland portion of this site is not directly adjacent to the IRL's shoreline, there are <br />existing canals between the upland portion and the IRL. These canals are predominately lined <br />with nuisance exotic vegetation and could benefit from a mitigation project associated with a <br />new waterway access facility. Also, a marina in this location could potentially utilize dry <br />storage instead of wetslips to further reduce impacts to estuarine wetlands. Due to an overall <br />lack of natural resource constraints and proposed expansion plans, a maximum shoreline/ <br />density ratio should not be applied to the portion of Lone 7 lying within the unincorporated <br />county, <br />Communily Development Department Page 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.