08/08/2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

to acres were for the homestead. Testified that it was 75.47 total agricultural classification. That was reduced to 41.27 acres agricultural with 22.59 nursery and 18.68 acres grazing. The grazing was reduced by 34.20 acres because of the non-use. Testified that the site inspections were the basis for the reduction along with the aerial views along with speaking to the Petitioner and no fencing for cattle, no cattle on the property, no evidence of cattle for the lease. Testified that the site visits were 6/8/2022, 11/17/2022 and the aerial visits were 9/25/2022 through 10/2022. Testified that the notice for the reductions were mailed 6/30/2023. Testified that the Petitioner applied on 2/22/2023 with the letter to the Petitioner noticing the Petitioner to re -apply going out on 12/21/2022 for non- use. Property Appraiser's evidence was relevant, admissible and credible. PETITIONER:: DON LEWIS SKILES testified. Testified that the Petitioner disputed the issue that the property had no cows. Testified that the property was being used to satisfy the "bona fide agricultural purposes" means good faith commercial agricultural use of the land clause of the Florida Statute 193.4613 (b) (1) language because cows were on the property. Testified to and disputed the results of the dates of the site visits by the Property Appraiser (site visits were 6/8/2022, 11/17/2022 and the aerial visits were 9/25/2022 through 10/2022) and the results of the site visits as testified to by the Property Appraiser' Office. Testified to and disputed the results of those inspections by the Property Appraiser's Office which were the basis for the reduction of the 75.47 prior total agricultural classification, now reduced to 41.27 acres agricultural with 22.59 nursery and 18.68 acres grazing. Testified that the Petitioner objected to and disputed the grazing reduction by 34.20 acres because of the non-use as alleged by the Property Appraiser's Office. Testified to and disputed the aerial photos which were part of the evidence package submitted by the Property Appraiser's Office, without objection by the Petitioner, which depicted the property without cows on it and which was part of the basis for the reduction of the 34.20 acres because of the non-use as alleged by the Property Appraiser's Office. Testified that the cows were not on the property full time and that the Petitioner has had fencing issues which allowed the cattle to leave the property. Testified that the Petitioner moved the cows to an adjacent property on 2022. Petitioner's evidence was relevant, admissible and credible. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The undersigned Special Magistrate finds that the following below is controlling and or persuasive in the recommendation: Florida Statute 193.461 Agricultural lands; classification and assessment; mandated eradication or quarantine program; natural disasters.— (3) (b) Subject to the restrictions specified in this section, only lands that are used primarily for bona fide agricultural purposes shall be classified agricultural. The term "bona fide agricultural purposes" means good faith commercial agricultural use of the land is the guideline and the basis for the denial. 1. In determining whether the use of the land for agricultural purposes is bona fide, the following factors may be taken into consideration: a. The length of time the land has been so used. b. Whether the use has been continuous. -36-