My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-319
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2000
>
2000-319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2024 12:39:28 PM
Creation date
8/6/2024 12:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
10/17/2000
Control Number
2000-319
Agenda Item Number
14.B.3.
Entity Name
GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc.
Subject
Implementation of Ground-Water Monitoring & Remediation Plan for
Gifford Closed Landfill Site (Humane Society)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GF.oSVNUC CUNSU rk.l. <br />Mr. Ronald R. Brooks <br />8 lune 1999 <br />Page 4 <br />alternative can later be expanded to a full-scale system (following FDEP approval of the <br />RAP). <br />Candidate technologies to be considered under Task 2C include; (i) insitu treatment <br />of groundwater by biosparging; (ii) maim treatment of groundwater by air sparging; slid <br />(iii) insim treatment of soils by soil vapor extraction. As part of this evaluation, <br />GeoSyntec will work with IRC to assist in selecting a remedial strategy to be pursued <br />further with a pilot test. The PRAP will include detailed procedures to implement the <br />pilot test program. <br />Since we have already had discussions on this subject with IRC and FDEP, the <br />attached cost estimate assumes design of a pilot test biosparging remedial system. If a <br />more complicated pilot test system design is needed based on the evaluation of remedial <br />options and input by IRC, GeoSyntec may need to request additional budget to <br />complete this task. <br />Task 2D: Develop MNA Evaluation Workolan <br />We understand that Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) should be evaluated as <br />a potential component of the overall site remedy. To begin this MNA evaluation, <br />currently available information will be utilized and data gaps will be identified in the <br />PRAP. As a result, an MNA Evaluation Workplan will be prepared and included in the <br />PRAP and will specify the fieldwork necessary to fill data gaps which will ultimately <br />allow a demonstration of the viability of MNA as a remedial option in accordance with <br />FDEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines. <br />Task 2E: Draft PRAP Review Meeting with IRC <br />GeoSyntec will meet with IRC to review the draft PRAP and to discuss the pros <br />and cons of each scoped work element (including order of magnitude costs, <br />implementation schedules, etc.) and compliance with IRC's objectives/goals for the site. <br />Mr. Chris Herin and Ms. Nandra Weeks will attend a 0.5 -day meeting with IRC. <br />XR98070/F990270.DOC <br />AOL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.